Wednesday, June 8, 2011

tetek rozita che wan

tetek rozita che wan. medium length mens hairstyles.tetek rozita che wan. medium length mens hairstyles.
  • medium length mens hairstyles.



  • maveric979
    09-08 10:38 AM
    Good atleast we can have jobs, fr..ing last couple of years tired of loosing jobs because of Outsourcing companies. Waiting for GC from 9 years and now struggling to keep the job because of Outsourcing. Big F for OS





    tetek rozita che wan. 6x7 Foreman and 13 - Housetetek rozita che wan. 6x7 Foreman and 13 - House
  • 6x7 Foreman and 13 - House



  • vamsi_poondla
    09-23 11:19 AM
    If your priority date is too close (within few years), become a consultant. Then your job duties will be flexible. You can do ALL that you have cited in labor certification and yet do additional duties.

    (Is your labor based on RIR?)

    Anyway follow attorney's advice.





    tetek rozita che wan. Blood Diamond Movie Stilltetek rozita che wan. Blood Diamond Movie Still
  • Blood Diamond Movie Still



  • chanduv23
    07-25 09:34 AM
    I am in same situation. My previous employer has informed me that he has already revoked my 140 petition. I sent in the ac21 paperwork to be on safer side and also verified my home address on records in case they send something. You may want to do the same, also, make sure you have your own Attorney and file for G28 promptly.





    tetek rozita che wan. LADIES, Cast Your Votestetek rozita che wan. LADIES, Cast Your Votes
  • LADIES, Cast Your Votes



  • snathan
    03-19 07:58 PM
    What are (if any) the tax implications > if a H1b or EAD holder sells his/her house?

    From what i knew there were no special "taxes" or implications... but someone (a lawyer) recently told me in addition to everything else there is a 10% tax (federal) on selling price?

    Can anyone who has sold a property on h1 or EAD confirm this?

    Please share first hand experience and not something that someones heard through the grapevine

    I think you need to talk to the CPA for tax and not lawyer....



    more...


    tetek rozita che wan. more.tetek rozita che wan. more.
  • more.



  • gcpadmavyuh
    10-12 09:05 AM
    The maximum time allowed on H1B is 6 years, this includes the time you spent on L1. This is the reason why you have been given H1B that is only valid for 1 year.

    On a side note, the maximum time allowed on L1 is 5 years - you had to go back to India since you have spent the maximum allowable time on that visa.

    Now, there are two ways to extend your stay beyond the initial 5/6 yrs granted on H1 or L1 visas.

    1. For both L1 and H1Bs: Go back to your country (India) for 1 yr after your initial term expires. After 1 yr stay in your home country, you will be eligible for "another cycle" of L1/H1. So, for L1 you will get another 5 yrs, and H1B another 6 yrs.


    2. Another way to extend your H1B is to start your Green card process (file your labor, and then your 140). Once your labor is pending for > 1 yr, or your 140 is approved, you will be eligible for 1 yr or 3 yr H1B extensions. This does not apply to L1s.


    Here is what I would suggest for your case:

    Best case scenario: Wait until your 1 yr clock resets, apply for fresh L1A (multi national manager). Once you are in the USA, convince your company to file for your green card in EB1 - multi national manager. The EB1 is almost always current, you can get your GC pretty soon.

    This is the best case scenario that I can envision for you.

    Alternatively,you can come back immediately on H1, apply for your PERM and 140, and then get unlimited extensions based on your GC being pending.

    You can also wait until your 1 yr clock resets and then enter on H1 in Feb 2008, where by you might be able to claim 5 more years on H1B extensions ( a total of fresh 6 yrs on your current H1B). eventually, you will have to file for your PERM and 140 and then get extensions beyond the 6 yrs. I think you will need to file a petition with USCIS indicating the H1B clock reset.

    Merely applying for L1A will not invalidate your H1. however, entering on L1A will invalidate your H1b (you can only hold one visa at a time - L1 or H1B). BTW... I guess you can not enter on L1 until you reset your 1 yr clock.

    If I were you,I would seriously consider entering on L1A and then filing for EB1 GC. This is the quickest possible route for your GC. Unless, ofcourse, you do not want to be with the company for another year or so because your relationship with the employer is strained.

    Dear experts.. Need your advise..

    I stayed in US for full 5 years on L1-B. After 5 years period I applied for H1-B and returned to Inida on 1-Jan-07. And I got H1-B in lottery. Below are my queries

    1) My I-797 says that its valid for only one year till October 2008. What could be the reason. (Because I stayed 5 years in US? )

    2) So is it advisable to go to stamping after 1-Jan-08? Or can I go for stamping now? I don't want to be in a situtation where I'll b given Visa till Jan'08?

    3) Now my company wants to apply for L1-A. What happens to my current H1-B if L1 is applied?

    Assuming applying L1 is not going to be invalidate my H1 papers,
    4) If I go for L1 stamping, will it invalidate my H1-B papers?

    5) If I come to US on L1, is it possible to change status to H1?

    Any help will be greatly appreciated.





    tetek rozita che wan. more 18 weeks pregnant.tetek rozita che wan. more 18 weeks pregnant.
  • more 18 weeks pregnant.



  • reachinus
    12-24 12:44 PM
    If you don't get the regular W2, then you fill in all the details that you know are correct and submit it along with your tax filings saying that you asked your employer to issue you the W2/Correct W2 with all the Pay info, but since he didn't give you the correct W2 your are using a non standard W2. IF u google it I am sure u will find it.

    Its better to have pay stubs for all the time that you are on H1 to avoid future problems.



    more...


    tetek rozita che wan. Blond Pink Emo Hairtetek rozita che wan. Blond Pink Emo Hair
  • Blond Pink Emo Hair



  • thomachan72
    03-07 09:32 AM
    Deadline added to this initiative to decide whether to proceed or not.
    please see post below for details.

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum14-members-forum/1599353-want-to-file-485-when-pd-is-not-current-gather-here-104.html#post2412248



    [QUote = ashwin_27]

    As suggested by several members on this thread, IV has set a goal of April 30th, 2011 to determine if there is even enough appetite within the EB community to proceed with this USCIS Admin Fix initiative or not.
    As we know the initial goal was to use this survey to determine how many members will be benefitted by I-485 filing without current priority date. Rough calculations using PERM data showed that at least 50-70K folks are waiting to file I-485 since July 2007 (around 5K-6K out of this number are those with PDs prior to June/July 2007 missed the July 2007 boat).
    So far we have had around 1200 such members respond. We need to see support of at least 5000 members in order for IV to launch the public action items. These action items include, but are not limited to, writing en-masse (i.e. in thousands) over 2-3 weeks to several concerned departments about the need for this USCIS administrative fix. Few other very interesting proposals/ideas are also being considered. All we need is our folks to BELIEVE that this initiative is worth investing in.
    The IV forum is the best place for the impacted EB community to gather and that is why the number of votes on the survey is a great indication of our frustration and motivation to work with IV for this important admin fix.
    So, we now have a Deadline and an Objective. It is up to our impacted members to decide on whether to still stick to silly excuses (why should I become a member, why should i vote on survey etc etc.) or DO something about getting this admin fix. It is surprising that we are not more desperate for this fix and are not convincing and pushing IV harder and harder to start working with USCIS to allow I485 filing with current PD (and all the benefits like EAD, AP that go with it).
    Are we more comfortable with the alternative - Waiting endelesslly to file I-485 (at least 2-5 years for post July 2007 folks from any category), keep depending on H1B extensions in an uncertain immigration scenario where H1B RFE's, rejections, visa denials due to "admin processing" etc are on a steep rise? The choice is ours to make.
    As a final reminder - please act and convince your friends/colleagues to participate in this initiative and send ivcoordinator@gmail.com the details requested below.
    Please keep following and participating on this thread to show your desperation for this fix.

    Good post but we need more information.
    How many members does IV have in total?
    What % out of that total has not filed 485 yet?
    Only if we know these two can we say that you need 5000 to go ahead with this plan.
    I think 5000 might be too big a number given the total membership and number of those who have already filed 485.
    1200 seems to be a good number.





    tetek rozita che wan. Gambar Raya Rozita Che Wantetek rozita che wan. Gambar Raya Rozita Che Wan
  • Gambar Raya Rozita Che Wan



  • Administrator2
    09-15 05:21 PM
    Last time CIR had sweet deal for Illegals ..
    Pay $100 and get Z visa ( Work Permit ) .. --> GC --> Citizenship ---> Vote for ?? ..

    For Legals ...go back and restart in new queue .. We dont want to skilled people be free of our companies. We expect you to be enslaved ..We are leader of Free world.

    What happened in 2007 is now history. That is not likely to repeat in the upcoming CIR. At this time CIR is the only way to get things moving. Unless CIR is defeated or unless administration says that they do not want a CIR bill, piece meal approach is not likely to happen. Given the situation, asking for a separate bills is setting ourselves for failure, and it alienates us and our issues from the pro-immigration community. At this time, if you call/meet with lawmakers asking for EB only bill, the pro-immigration lawmakers get turned off and anti-immigrant lawmakers use the count of your call to oppose the immigration reform. At this time its a bad idea by calling lawmakers asking for "EB only bill". It will only turn out to hurt our issues and the cause. Additionally, it doesn't help to call specific lawmakers who already understand, agree, support and champion our issues.

    IV do not have a any position on on the issue of illegals/undocumented. And whatever is your personal belief, please understand the reality of the situation and refrain from attacking illegals on IV forums as it doesn't help our cause in anyways.



    more...


    tetek rozita che wan. sa lakonan rozita che wantetek rozita che wan. sa lakonan rozita che wan
  • sa lakonan rozita che wan



  • alterego
    12-12 07:03 PM
    My guess is they retrogressed to basically stem demand completely as they felt they had used too many visas too soon, and that is where they decided they need to put the date to extinguish demand. Last month they tried Jan. 2002, but quite clearly that did not have the desired impact. Hence the further move backward.

    This is not too hard to see once you realize you are speaking about 2800 visas for EB2 India, and that means 700 per quarter or about 250-300 primary beneficiaries. When they kept PD at Apr 2004 for the first 3 months, why is it hard to envision that they went through say about 500 primary applicants with such dates, between genuinely old petitions, substitute labor petitions and EB3 to EB2 jumpers, backlog center applicants etc? I mean the truth hurts but this is where it is at. My guess is they have almost certainly used up over 1/2 of the annual allotment for EB2 India, hence they mentioned last month they used up 38% and now they are warning about the possibility of unavailability in coming months preparing us for the inevitable.
    EB3 won't be too far behind in my guesstimate since if they move dates by just a few months this will drive up demand and the fate of that PD will be the same as EB2. 2800 visas inclusive of family members for EB2 and EB3 India is like feeding a hungry lion a chicken wing.:)

    The one possibility that might help us is if once again around the may-june-july time period they accelerate demand by moving EB India to use up visa numbers. If my memory serves me right they did end up using about 15K visas for EB2 India last year. There is no guarantee they will do that again this year however after last years VB fiasco for which they took a lot of heat, they may just let the visas go.
    I see visa recapture as our only hope for temporary relief. Failing which we desperately need administrative fixes like 3yr EADs etc to ease our pain while we wait out the presidential elections next year. Lets hope for the best with the omnibus legislation.





    tetek rozita che wan. Di besar siot kt tetek kotetetek rozita che wan. Di besar siot kt tetek kote
  • Di besar siot kt tetek kote



  • paulinasmith
    08-05 12:54 PM
    Hi guys, I am trying to understand this whole process and was wondering if you could help me out.

    I'm a CPA working for a Big4 in the US for h1-B. I have 2 years of experiences (1 with the same company). I am not from Europe. I have the following 2 questions:

    1. What can I expect in terms of waiting for a GC if my employer were to file today? It's a huge firm and submits many GC sponsorship requests per year. I belieave 700 were submitted in 2009.

    2. Would my CPA/Lvl 2 CFA Certification as well as my membership in professional organizations and performance bonuses (highlighting exceptional ability) bump me up to EB2 if EB3 is not current?

    Thank you for your input.


    Even if u are born in Europe the EB-3 priority date of India and Europe are equal/same. EB-3 no longer depend upon your place of Birth.



    more...


    tetek rozita che wan. Creston High School Boystetek rozita che wan. Creston High School Boys
  • Creston High School Boys



  • Dustinthewind
    01-05 12:48 AM
    @sanju_dba - Sorry to disappoint you. We did think about making a documentary, but in the end we all figured that a lot more people might be interested in a narrative feature film. Perhaps we are wrong, but it was just a decision that our team collectively made.

    @waitingnwaiting - Thanks for your honest feedback. You are right about a lot of things. All I can say is, I've been in this country for over 10 years still waiting for a green card like a lot of people. I just wanted to do something to make more people aware of the issues. I'm passionate about film making so I figured way I can do it is to make a film about stories based on my personal experience. Now, I don't know how the audience will perceive the film or if it will change their mind. But one thing's for sure, we all have given our best to this film and attempted to tell stories that have affected our lives.

    Thanks again for the comments.





    tetek rozita che wan. Craving For Foodtetek rozita che wan. Craving For Food
  • Craving For Food



  • i99
    09-19 12:39 PM
    ... this means nothing. it might mean "none of the above" in a multiple choice situation and might be put by mistake. might be good to have it corrected though. :rolleyes:

    --a person who does not know what happened to own application at all. :)



    more...


    tetek rozita che wan. Saturday, 16 April 2011tetek rozita che wan. Saturday, 16 April 2011
  • Saturday, 16 April 2011



  • bmoni
    03-30 10:53 PM
    Congratulations





    tetek rozita che wan. blondie debbie harry.tetek rozita che wan. blondie debbie harry.
  • blondie debbie harry.



  • dudu
    05-09 03:02 PM
    Just some throught?

    Could you post all the local contact for IV core member? Since we can work together with local contact to raise the issue we have. Even we can arrange local event.



    more...


    tetek rozita che wan. Amytetek rozita che wan. Amy
  • Amy



  • vikramy
    06-22 10:14 AM
    From what i know If chest x-ray is clear you are good. I would suggest to find a different surgeon. good to have a second opinion

    Guys,

    I have got a RFE for my medical on 9th June 2009. We got our medical done in July 2007 and filed in July 2007.

    The RFE is mentioning my medical records cannot be found. we are pretty sure we did file it.

    My lawyer says the best way is to get a new medical done and send the new reports. I heard his advise and went to get a new medical exam. The civil surgeon asked me for PPD (TB Test) reports from previous years (1998) as in 2007 (when only the X Rays were done and they were clear), the size of the induration was NOT required but says now we need the size. I am trying to get the reports from the hospital where I got the testing done, but it has been more than 7 days and i am still waiting. The civil surgeon says that if we don't find the records we can do another TB test.

    My PCP says that once the TB test is positive, it is always going to be positive (which is true as i got it done twice - 1997 and 1998) and the 2nd time the induration was more than the first time. If i get it 3rd time, is it going to be more induration? Also, are there chances of reaction due to getting it done the 3rd time? I think my PCP mentioned something like this earlier.

    The civil surgeon says that if the induration is more than 10 mm, i might have to go through treatment :( I was shocked to hear that and did some reading and found out from another member too that the treatment is recommended and NOT required.

    If the TB test results from 1998, don't come in time for me to respond to the RFE, can i not send the copy of my original medical done? I am going to ask the lawyer about it too, but wanted to know some personal experience of the folks who have gone through it.





    tetek rozita che wan. blue waffles diseases images.tetek rozita che wan. blue waffles diseases images.
  • blue waffles diseases images.



  • mhathi
    02-03 05:10 PM
    Tomplate,

    My lawyer had also asked me to keep 485 receipt and EAD with me, but I was not asked to show anything but my passport and the AP documents. They did not even ask for 485 receipts.

    Unfortunately I know this does not answer your question fully, but hope it helps even if a bit!



    more...


    tetek rozita che wan. I#39;m obsessed with House, MD.tetek rozita che wan. I#39;m obsessed with House, MD.
  • I#39;m obsessed with House, MD.



  • desi3933
    03-03 12:42 PM
    LC approved in 2006, can I still apply for I-140?

    No.





    tetek rozita che wan. Wilmot High Schooltetek rozita che wan. Wilmot High School
  • Wilmot High School



  • days_go_by
    05-25 10:57 PM
    and everyone else involved.





    tetek rozita che wan. salmatetek rozita che wan. salma
  • salma



  • nixstor
    08-08 09:53 PM
    I guess he is trying to lift the sunken spirits of the IV members. But I feel that if SKIL goes through, we will be fine. It all depends on SKIL





    cagedcactus
    05-03 06:54 AM
    thanks a lot friends, I appreciate your inputs.......:)
    I had couple of companies contact me, so will look for a solid new start.
    4 years of wait down the drain......:mad:





    crazyAbtUS
    08-14 11:36 PM
    I was told by my attorney's office that the application will be rejected if re-filed. I have read though threads which claim that multiple filing is fine, but dont know what to trust!

    I480 filed - July,02, waiting for RD/ND
    I140, RD-11/03/06, LUD-11/11/07(NSC), Waiting for approval.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment