r6novak
Nov 19, 04:36 PM
I wrote the email to him - Headers below. It not a fake people...
i removed my email domain so no one emails my work.
From: Steve Jobs <sjobs@apple.com>
Subject: Re: TJ Maxx? Really?
Date: November 19, 2010 11:35:35 AM EST
To: Robert Novak <Robert.Novak@.com>
Received: from ma1ex02..com ([10.10.137.20]) by MA1WP1004..com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:39 -0500
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.3.131]) by ma1ex02..com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from source ([17.254.13.23]) (using TLSv1) by exprod8mx231.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:37 EST
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA824BE7291F for <Robert.Novak@.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earhart.apple.com (yeager.apple.com [17.150.10.19]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 24.35.06455.757A6EC4; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Auditid: 11807137-b7bf5ae000001937-8b-4ce6a757bc75
In-Reply-To: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
Message-Id: <179393F0-DC7A-417A-9198-72EC02EEADF7@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Iz2tfVRC00zRUwOWALJwNw)"
References: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
X-Pstn-Levels: (S:99.36494/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-Pstn-Settings: 5 (2.0000:0.3000) s cv GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-Pstn-Addresses: from <sjobs@apple.com> [133/9]
Return-Path: sjobs@apple.com
X-Originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2010 16:35:39.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCC6A470:01CB8807]
X-Tm-As-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4177-6.500.1024-17778.000
X-Tm-As-Result: No--27.709100-8.000000-31
X-Tm-As-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-Tm-As-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Email...
They are not an authorized reseller.
On Nov 19, at 8:11 AM, Robert Novak wrote:
Steve,
Actual stages of mitosis can
Cell cycle evolution of
Model for cell cycle
more...
and cell cycle regulators
Cell Cycle/Checkpoint 细胞
more...
phases of cell cycle.
Cell Cycle
more...
Cell cycle list
cell cycle stages (arrows)
more...
cycle showing the stages
stages of the cell cycle.
more...
cell cycle stages under
stages of the cell cycle
more...
Mitosis does cell division
cell cycle stages) can be
more...
cell cycle
yeast cell cycle lacks G2
Rank the stages from longest
i removed my email domain so no one emails my work.
From: Steve Jobs <sjobs@apple.com>
Subject: Re: TJ Maxx? Really?
Date: November 19, 2010 11:35:35 AM EST
To: Robert Novak <Robert.Novak@.com>
Received: from ma1ex02..com ([10.10.137.20]) by MA1WP1004..com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:39 -0500
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.3.131]) by ma1ex02..com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from source ([17.254.13.23]) (using TLSv1) by exprod8mx231.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:37 EST
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA824BE7291F for <Robert.Novak@.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earhart.apple.com (yeager.apple.com [17.150.10.19]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 24.35.06455.757A6EC4; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Auditid: 11807137-b7bf5ae000001937-8b-4ce6a757bc75
In-Reply-To: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
Message-Id: <179393F0-DC7A-417A-9198-72EC02EEADF7@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Iz2tfVRC00zRUwOWALJwNw)"
References: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
X-Pstn-Levels: (S:99.36494/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-Pstn-Settings: 5 (2.0000:0.3000) s cv GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-Pstn-Addresses: from <sjobs@apple.com> [133/9]
Return-Path: sjobs@apple.com
X-Originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2010 16:35:39.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCC6A470:01CB8807]
X-Tm-As-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4177-6.500.1024-17778.000
X-Tm-As-Result: No--27.709100-8.000000-31
X-Tm-As-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-Tm-As-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Email...
They are not an authorized reseller.
On Nov 19, at 8:11 AM, Robert Novak wrote:
Steve,
heyp
Oct 9, 04:40 PM
i have to reply again:
i'm really liking this app!! it's super fast and i love the fact that i can choose from a list of my friends to send an @ to multiple peeps (like bandmates, project members, etc.)
the only thing that seems VERY slow is the initial linking to the phones addy app...
is everyone having the same problem with that? when i hit the addy card on someone's profile, it takes about 20-30 seconds until it transfers to the iphone's addy app.
it's pretty quick for me, but i'm not a big fan how it changes their name and if you already have an image tied to that person, it will overwrite it with their twitter pic
i'm really liking this app!! it's super fast and i love the fact that i can choose from a list of my friends to send an @ to multiple peeps (like bandmates, project members, etc.)
the only thing that seems VERY slow is the initial linking to the phones addy app...
is everyone having the same problem with that? when i hit the addy card on someone's profile, it takes about 20-30 seconds until it transfers to the iphone's addy app.
it's pretty quick for me, but i'm not a big fan how it changes their name and if you already have an image tied to that person, it will overwrite it with their twitter pic
revelated
Jan 21, 11:15 PM
He doesn't need to actually drive that trip to be skeptical of your claim of a thousand miles on a tank of gas. Frankly, I'm skeptical of it too.
Okay, but you're claiming double that. Not 10% more or 20% more - double.
No. I'm claiming I got to Phoenix on half a tank of gas which is entirely doable and possible, if you know how to drive properly on freeways. Lead foots won't pull it off. Just because I got there with half a tank to spare after 500 miles does not automatically equate to 1000 on a full tank. Again, you people need to stop riding the numbers. It's not that simple.
After I got to Phoenix it was all city streets. The remainder of the gas burned out rather quickly. I'd say I was able to do a total of about 600 miles when it was all said and done. Again, the car is not burning gas if you're not pressing the accelerator. If the car is already going 80 MPH on a stretch, there's little need to press the accelerator constantly. All you have to do is tap it every so often to keep the car's momentum going, but in the meantime you're still traveling 80 MPH. You might only burn a quarter's worth of gas if you know how to not ride the accelerator.
Point being - it CAN be done, so don't tell me the Altima is less efficient than the Versa.
Okay, but you're claiming double that. Not 10% more or 20% more - double.
No. I'm claiming I got to Phoenix on half a tank of gas which is entirely doable and possible, if you know how to drive properly on freeways. Lead foots won't pull it off. Just because I got there with half a tank to spare after 500 miles does not automatically equate to 1000 on a full tank. Again, you people need to stop riding the numbers. It's not that simple.
After I got to Phoenix it was all city streets. The remainder of the gas burned out rather quickly. I'd say I was able to do a total of about 600 miles when it was all said and done. Again, the car is not burning gas if you're not pressing the accelerator. If the car is already going 80 MPH on a stretch, there's little need to press the accelerator constantly. All you have to do is tap it every so often to keep the car's momentum going, but in the meantime you're still traveling 80 MPH. You might only burn a quarter's worth of gas if you know how to not ride the accelerator.
Point being - it CAN be done, so don't tell me the Altima is less efficient than the Versa.
HiRez
Apr 7, 01:20 PM
Wow, that is completely awesome! Now we need the Colecovision emulator and games, and Namco and Nintendo packs...
It shows you how amazing these games were that they can still make money on them over 30 years later.
It shows you how amazing these games were that they can still make money on them over 30 years later.
more...
snowbrdr1
Mar 4, 09:56 PM
Search Cydia, I'm sure there's a way :D
MareoRaft
Oct 20, 09:10 PM
I need the HTML equivelent to the C language "c = getchar()" and "putchar()"
specifically, i am planning to use this information to input an email adress into an email function.
can you help me?
specifically, i am planning to use this information to input an email adress into an email function.
can you help me?
more...
rikers_mailbox
Oct 5, 08:50 PM
Those Safari updates? I would expect no less!!
If Safari didn't at least keep up with FireFox, then shame Apple. At best Safari should innovate just as much as Apple claims. How about CoverFlow for cached pages?
If Safari didn't at least keep up with FireFox, then shame Apple. At best Safari should innovate just as much as Apple claims. How about CoverFlow for cached pages?
neocell
Dec 10, 12:27 PM
Open Date & Time in System Preferences, and then under the Date & Time tab see if it's set to set time automatically and if you have the correct region selected from the pull down menu. Also make sure you have the correct time zone selected in the next tab.
**EDIT**
If that doesn't do anything maybe try reseting the PRAM (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=2238)
**EDIT**
If that doesn't do anything maybe try reseting the PRAM (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=2238)
more...
tag
Dec 23, 10:44 AM
Figured I'd post the original in a seperate post as well. This is the full one before resizing to fit into the avatar specs, just thought it looked cool when it had all the frames and larger size. Just wanted to share...
PODshady
Nov 20, 02:18 PM
Memrom iPhone NEXT TUESDAY!!!!!
HA!
HA!
more...
LiloThePleo
Feb 2, 10:40 PM
I made this entirely on my ipad :) This is for fellow robotic dinosaur (Pleo) lovers :P I have about thirty Pleo desktop backgrounds on rotation.
http://i352.photobucket.com/albums/r358/EStar5Diva/Screenshot2011-02-03at33430PM.png
http://i352.photobucket.com/albums/r358/EStar5Diva/Screenshot2011-02-03at33430PM.png
iJon
Aug 16, 02:06 AM
awesome, but for some reason that stem leaf seems different. from looking at the back of my powerbook it looks like it might be 2 thick, but it can also be my imagination.
iJon
iJon
more...
Glideslope
Apr 28, 07:34 PM
Apple should really diversify their suppliers anyway, which is what they look like they are doing. Cut Samsung supply by 50%, and threaten all of it if they don't get their act together. Surely Samsung doesn't think that that they can bring in this kind of revenue on their own merit. Outside of LCD televisions, Samsung has an image problem, and even that has only improved in the last few years.
Bulls Eye. :apple:
Bulls Eye. :apple:
Ann P
Dec 14, 06:45 PM
Please excuse the messy workspace.
Link (http://www.gadgetmac.com/picture/up_design_by_halpha-d32hze2.png?pictureId=7843099&asThumbnail=true)
Love this background, thanks for sharing!
Link (http://www.gadgetmac.com/picture/up_design_by_halpha-d32hze2.png?pictureId=7843099&asThumbnail=true)
Love this background, thanks for sharing!
more...
Buddybaila
Apr 10, 07:49 AM
My niece just noticed a crack on her iPad 2. She didn't drop it, she takes great care of it and she is a responsible adult. Has anyone else noticed an issue like this?
nizmoz
Dec 28, 08:38 AM
Well said. I was going to start typing a similar post but glad you did. The person that replied to the OP above saying IT people are clueless is 100% wrong as you are the one that is clueless. I run a IT department and there is no way MACs would ever become the Computer of choice over any Windows machine that has way more software for the enterprise than a MAC will ever see. And using Bootcamp is a waste of funds as PCs are cheaper. It always takes someone who has no clue about how IT works to say something like that.
Yeah, sure. Because all of those business/enterprise applications written exclusively for Windows run ah-so smoothly on Macs...
Just accept it, folks: There is no business case for using Macs in an enterprise environment.
Compatibility? Fail. (There is a world beyond the Microsoft .doc format where enterprise applications live. There's OLD Java, and many Java apps require a very specific Oracle JVM to run. There's .NET. There's Sharepoint. There's an IBM mainframe you need to talk to. There are department printers that have no OS X drivers. There's a long list of office equipment that only plays well with Windows.)
Enterprise-ready? Fail. See compatibility, see support, see backup.
Central administration? Fail. Try applying group policies to a Mac.
Central backup? Fail. No, Time Machine is NOT an enterprise solution.
TCO? Fail. Expensive hardware, short-lived platform support.
Enterprise-support from the manufacturer (Apple)? HUGE fail.
Roadmaps? Fail. Apple doesn't even know what the word means. You just cannot plan with this company and their products.
Product longevity? Knock-out Fail. (Try getting support for OS X Leopard in two years from now. Try getting support for Tiger or Panther TODAY. Then compare it to Windows XP, an OS from the year that will be officially supported until 2014. Then make your strategic choice and tell me with a straight face that you want to bet your money on Cupertino toys.)
It's MUCH easier to integrate Linux desktops into an enterprise environment than it is to put Mac OS X boxes in there. Why? Because some "blue chip" companies like Oracle and IBM actually use, sell and support Linux and make sure that it can be used in an enterprise environment.
Trying to push a home user/consumer platform like the Mac into a corporate environment is a very bad idea. Especially if the company behind the product recently even announced that they dropped their entire server hardware because nobody wanted them. Why should the head of a large IT department trust a company that just dropped their only product that was even remotely targeted at the enterprise market? It's like asking a CTO to bet the company's IT future on Nintendo Wiis.
And just for your info: I've had those discussions at the World Health Organization of the United Nations, and it turned out to be IMPOSSIBLE to integrate Macs into their IT environment. I had the only Mac (a 20" Core Duo) in a world wide network because I was able to talk someone higher up the ladder into approving the purchase order for it, but then I quickly had to give up on OS X and instead run Windows on it in order to get my job as an IT admin done and be able to use the IT resources of the other WHO centers. OS X Tiger totally sucked in our network for almost all of the above reasons, but Windows Vista and XP got the job done perfectly. It wasn't very persuasive to show off a Mac that only runs Windows. That's what you get for being an Apple fanboy, which I admittedly was at that time.
Where I work now, two other people bought Macs, and one of them has ordered Windows 7 yesterday and wants me to wipe out OS X from his hard disk and replace it with Windows. He's an engineer and not productive with OS X, rather the opposite: OS X slows him down and doesn't provide any value to him.
And personally, after more than five years in Apple land, I will now also move away from OS X. It's a consumer platform that's only there to lock people into the Apple hardware and their iTunes store. If the web browser and iTunes and maybe Final Cut Studio, Logic Studio or the Adobe Creative Suites are the only pieces of software that you need to be happy, then OS X probably is okay for you. For everything else, it quickly becomes a very expensive trap or just a disappointment. When Apple brag about how cool it is to run Windows in "Boot Camp" or a virtualization software, then this rather demonstrates the shortcomings of the Mac platform instead of its strengths. I can also run Windows in VirtualBox on Linux. But why is this an advantage? Where's the sense in dividing my hardware resources to support TWO operating systems to get ONE job done? What's the rationalization for that? There is none. It just shows that the Mac still is not a full computing platform without Microsoft products. And that is the ultimate case AGAINST migrating to Mac OS X.
Yeah, sure. Because all of those business/enterprise applications written exclusively for Windows run ah-so smoothly on Macs...
Just accept it, folks: There is no business case for using Macs in an enterprise environment.
Compatibility? Fail. (There is a world beyond the Microsoft .doc format where enterprise applications live. There's OLD Java, and many Java apps require a very specific Oracle JVM to run. There's .NET. There's Sharepoint. There's an IBM mainframe you need to talk to. There are department printers that have no OS X drivers. There's a long list of office equipment that only plays well with Windows.)
Enterprise-ready? Fail. See compatibility, see support, see backup.
Central administration? Fail. Try applying group policies to a Mac.
Central backup? Fail. No, Time Machine is NOT an enterprise solution.
TCO? Fail. Expensive hardware, short-lived platform support.
Enterprise-support from the manufacturer (Apple)? HUGE fail.
Roadmaps? Fail. Apple doesn't even know what the word means. You just cannot plan with this company and their products.
Product longevity? Knock-out Fail. (Try getting support for OS X Leopard in two years from now. Try getting support for Tiger or Panther TODAY. Then compare it to Windows XP, an OS from the year that will be officially supported until 2014. Then make your strategic choice and tell me with a straight face that you want to bet your money on Cupertino toys.)
It's MUCH easier to integrate Linux desktops into an enterprise environment than it is to put Mac OS X boxes in there. Why? Because some "blue chip" companies like Oracle and IBM actually use, sell and support Linux and make sure that it can be used in an enterprise environment.
Trying to push a home user/consumer platform like the Mac into a corporate environment is a very bad idea. Especially if the company behind the product recently even announced that they dropped their entire server hardware because nobody wanted them. Why should the head of a large IT department trust a company that just dropped their only product that was even remotely targeted at the enterprise market? It's like asking a CTO to bet the company's IT future on Nintendo Wiis.
And just for your info: I've had those discussions at the World Health Organization of the United Nations, and it turned out to be IMPOSSIBLE to integrate Macs into their IT environment. I had the only Mac (a 20" Core Duo) in a world wide network because I was able to talk someone higher up the ladder into approving the purchase order for it, but then I quickly had to give up on OS X and instead run Windows on it in order to get my job as an IT admin done and be able to use the IT resources of the other WHO centers. OS X Tiger totally sucked in our network for almost all of the above reasons, but Windows Vista and XP got the job done perfectly. It wasn't very persuasive to show off a Mac that only runs Windows. That's what you get for being an Apple fanboy, which I admittedly was at that time.
Where I work now, two other people bought Macs, and one of them has ordered Windows 7 yesterday and wants me to wipe out OS X from his hard disk and replace it with Windows. He's an engineer and not productive with OS X, rather the opposite: OS X slows him down and doesn't provide any value to him.
And personally, after more than five years in Apple land, I will now also move away from OS X. It's a consumer platform that's only there to lock people into the Apple hardware and their iTunes store. If the web browser and iTunes and maybe Final Cut Studio, Logic Studio or the Adobe Creative Suites are the only pieces of software that you need to be happy, then OS X probably is okay for you. For everything else, it quickly becomes a very expensive trap or just a disappointment. When Apple brag about how cool it is to run Windows in "Boot Camp" or a virtualization software, then this rather demonstrates the shortcomings of the Mac platform instead of its strengths. I can also run Windows in VirtualBox on Linux. But why is this an advantage? Where's the sense in dividing my hardware resources to support TWO operating systems to get ONE job done? What's the rationalization for that? There is none. It just shows that the Mac still is not a full computing platform without Microsoft products. And that is the ultimate case AGAINST migrating to Mac OS X.
more...
iphones4evry1
Oct 9, 09:45 PM
Competition is a good thing. I'm on my third Twitter App right now, and this looks promising. I'm going to get this one and hopefully it will be better than the App I have right now. And hopefully competition will keep making the Apps better and better. :)
xkmxkmxlmx
May 6, 11:56 PM
WAY better than my mid-2007 iMac for sure. Can't tell you about the models after that.
localman
Nov 12, 07:28 PM
Jobs (and most of us here) are missing the point. It's not about getting a release window for the next iteration of FCP, it's about running a business and the need to plan according to a supplier's roadmap. This is one area where Apple totally blows: without awareness of basic features, likely timelines, and a clear product commitment, it's nerve wracking and borderline irresponsible to use Apple products in the backbone of any business.
Cue the apologists, but I've been in the driver's seat on this and for serious professionals it is an abuse that Apple should stop. If a product is claimed to be for professional use, then give the professionals the information they need to plan and run their business. If you don't get why this matters, I'm going to guess you've never run a business where you had the responsibility for people's livelihood on your shoulders.
Cue the apologists, but I've been in the driver's seat on this and for serious professionals it is an abuse that Apple should stop. If a product is claimed to be for professional use, then give the professionals the information they need to plan and run their business. If you don't get why this matters, I'm going to guess you've never run a business where you had the responsibility for people's livelihood on your shoulders.
Full of Win
May 1, 05:17 PM
so...you want @mycastle.com ?
or
fullofwin@yourcastleonly.com
I'm quite happy with ----------@mac.com, which I use daily. I just wish they would have never changed it.
or
fullofwin@yourcastleonly.com
I'm quite happy with ----------@mac.com, which I use daily. I just wish they would have never changed it.
Vivid.Inferno
Dec 3, 01:02 AM
262497
Link please?
Link please?
RedReplicant
Aug 5, 04:04 PM
http://redreplicant.mylha.com/temp/dtop-aug5.jpg
ps. The IPs belong to people that tried to brute force my server, so I could care less about hiding them.
ps. The IPs belong to people that tried to brute force my server, so I could care less about hiding them.
Crager724
Dec 16, 05:02 PM
You are right Wildcowboy. I really didn't like it once I saw it that size, it looked better bigger. I'll do better next time. In fact I've found that "trial and error" seems to be the best way to learn sometimes.
Soreo
Jun 22, 04:19 PM
Whooa, never mind. This only accounts for AT&T stores. Apple stores will have walk-in sales on Thursday
No comments:
Post a Comment