Blog Feeds
09-28 12:50 PM
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has launched its newly re-designed Web site (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis). Although the Web site update was scheduled to be introduced September 22, 2009, attorney Eugenia Ponce visited the site Monday and has this report:
The updated Web site is organized according to categories.The categories are displayed as Topics, Forms, Resources, Laws, News, and About Us. The topics are categorized as follows: Adoption, Permanent Residence, Humanitarian, Citizenship, Members of the Military and Their Family, Family, Visit the U.S., Working in the U.S, and Genealogy. After clicking on a specific topic, I was provided helpful information and even more additional information was available through the links on the left of the screen.The advantage of categorizing the information by topic is that individuals are now able to familiarize themselves with the process from start to finish. There are other helpful links and tools within each specific topic.
Another key feature to the Web site is that there is a “where to start” link. Before, individuals could navigate throughout the Web site not knowing where to even begin their search on a narrow issue. Now, the “where to start link” will allow individuals to begin their immigration search by narrowing it down to their specific issue. For instance, there is a scroll-down available for individuals under the “where to start” link. It states “I Am,” and one can select from the various choices available and get specific information relating to any issue.
Given the new era with text messaging (even various airline companies provide flight and gate status information through text messaging), USCIS has upgraded its site by adding a link that allows individuals to receive case status updates via text messages. The newly designed site has provided a one-stop resource center for individuals with specific queries and I am excited in navigating throughout their links. Visit the newly re-designed USCIS Web site (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis) and see the improvements for yourself.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/m6kvujwmnC8/)
The updated Web site is organized according to categories.The categories are displayed as Topics, Forms, Resources, Laws, News, and About Us. The topics are categorized as follows: Adoption, Permanent Residence, Humanitarian, Citizenship, Members of the Military and Their Family, Family, Visit the U.S., Working in the U.S, and Genealogy. After clicking on a specific topic, I was provided helpful information and even more additional information was available through the links on the left of the screen.The advantage of categorizing the information by topic is that individuals are now able to familiarize themselves with the process from start to finish. There are other helpful links and tools within each specific topic.
Another key feature to the Web site is that there is a “where to start” link. Before, individuals could navigate throughout the Web site not knowing where to even begin their search on a narrow issue. Now, the “where to start link” will allow individuals to begin their immigration search by narrowing it down to their specific issue. For instance, there is a scroll-down available for individuals under the “where to start” link. It states “I Am,” and one can select from the various choices available and get specific information relating to any issue.
Given the new era with text messaging (even various airline companies provide flight and gate status information through text messaging), USCIS has upgraded its site by adding a link that allows individuals to receive case status updates via text messages. The newly designed site has provided a one-stop resource center for individuals with specific queries and I am excited in navigating throughout their links. Visit the newly re-designed USCIS Web site (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis) and see the improvements for yourself.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/m6kvujwmnC8/)
wallpaper Penélope Cruz received her
Blog Feeds
11-14 04:21 AM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
“If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act”
The following is a statement from Lynn Tramonte, Deputy Director of America’s Voice:
We have entered a new chapter and a new phase in the immigration debate. Secretary Napolitano today laid out the framework for fixing the broken immigration system, and the solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Drawing on her years of experience on the southwest border, and her new role as the nation’s top homeland security official, she said that we need Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, and create immigration laws that truly work for our country.
Reform will secure the border, protect all workers, and require undocumented immigrants to register for legal status, pay fines and taxes, clear background checks, and get in line for citizenship. This will benefit all Americans by strengthening the rule of law, bringing in more taxpayers, cutting costs for enforcement, and making our nation’s borders stronger and safer. Now is the time for Congress to take the next step and pass legislation that would accomplish these goals.
As Secretary Napolitano pointed out, the American people support comprehensive immigration reform, and the debate we are about to engage in is not the same old debate. Law enforcement, labor, business, faith, and community leaders are all demanding comprehensive reform for our nation’s security, economy, workers, and families. We have a new President, who was elected because he promised to address important problems like this with practical solutions. We have a new Congress, with leaders who also promised change and progress to the American people.
The Secretary’s speech today was an important moment, but it was just the opening bell. It’s now time for Congress and the Administration to put serious muscle behind advancing the proposal – and it’s time for politicians of all political parties to set aside partisanship and demagoguery, and do what’s right for the country.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/proposed-immigration-laws/secretary-napolitano-makes-the-case-for-comprehensive-immigration-reform.php)
“If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act”
The following is a statement from Lynn Tramonte, Deputy Director of America’s Voice:
We have entered a new chapter and a new phase in the immigration debate. Secretary Napolitano today laid out the framework for fixing the broken immigration system, and the solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Drawing on her years of experience on the southwest border, and her new role as the nation’s top homeland security official, she said that we need Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, and create immigration laws that truly work for our country.
Reform will secure the border, protect all workers, and require undocumented immigrants to register for legal status, pay fines and taxes, clear background checks, and get in line for citizenship. This will benefit all Americans by strengthening the rule of law, bringing in more taxpayers, cutting costs for enforcement, and making our nation’s borders stronger and safer. Now is the time for Congress to take the next step and pass legislation that would accomplish these goals.
As Secretary Napolitano pointed out, the American people support comprehensive immigration reform, and the debate we are about to engage in is not the same old debate. Law enforcement, labor, business, faith, and community leaders are all demanding comprehensive reform for our nation’s security, economy, workers, and families. We have a new President, who was elected because he promised to address important problems like this with practical solutions. We have a new Congress, with leaders who also promised change and progress to the American people.
The Secretary’s speech today was an important moment, but it was just the opening bell. It’s now time for Congress and the Administration to put serious muscle behind advancing the proposal – and it’s time for politicians of all political parties to set aside partisanship and demagoguery, and do what’s right for the country.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/proposed-immigration-laws/secretary-napolitano-makes-the-case-for-comprehensive-immigration-reform.php)
gcpool
04-18 06:49 PM
http://www.myvisajobs.com/
2011 Penelope Cruz Oscar
gopi544
10-30 05:02 PM
i worked for 5 years (2005 till now), i will have 4 w2`s and they are asking for all w-2. i have all the w2`s expect for 2006 form previous company which i left in feb 2006.
more...
ski_dude12
06-29 07:15 PM
Anyone...???
Tommy_S
05-20 01:40 AM
Added a pink thing.
Looks a bit rough\agressive\bright on the blue bg. But hey, nice stamp. ;)
P.S. I wonder, who did the Kf's theme.. j/k. :P
Looks a bit rough\agressive\bright on the blue bg. But hey, nice stamp. ;)
P.S. I wonder, who did the Kf's theme.. j/k. :P
more...
lazycis
01-10 08:52 AM
Your status is Parolee for 1,2 and 3
Agree on 1 and 2. But it is (c) (9) FILED I-485 for #3. I applied recently with no problem. Include a copy I-485 receipt.
Agree on 1 and 2. But it is (c) (9) FILED I-485 for #3. I applied recently with no problem. Include a copy I-485 receipt.
2010 Penelope Cruz earned her
Blog Feeds
10-28 01:10 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) recently upheld the final determination (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=30320) of a Certifying Officer (CO) denying labor certification (LC) for an alien worker for the position of Electrical Helper.
The employer filed a LC (http://www.mvplawgroup.com/greencards.php?action=laborcert) on behalf of an alien worker and in November of 2007, the CO denied the application because he was unable to verify the Employer as a bona fide business entity. The Employer requested reconsideration by submitting its 2006 Federal Corporate Tax Return, its Business Certificate Registration and two utility bills. The Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) provided on the 2006 Tax Return only matched the first two digits of the FEIN previously provided on Form ETA 9089. Furthermore, the utility bills and the tax return provided a different address from that on the Business Certificate Registration. Thereafter, the CO issued a letter denying reconsideration because the FEIN on the corporate tax return did not match the FEIN on ETA Form 9089. The CO then forwarded the case to BALCA. The Employer filed a letter stating that its company had two addresses, one for its motor shop and the other for its main office, the CO did not file an appellate brief with the Board.
Upon BALCA review, it was determined that the requirement in ETA Form 9089 requiring submission of a FEIN was fully supported by the regulations and by policy of using the FEIN as a means of verifying whether an employer is a bona fide business entity. An employer MUST possess a valid FEIN when applying for labor certification pursuant to PERM (http://www.mvplawgroup.com/greencards.php?action=permprocess) regulation 20 C.F.R. � 656.3. In the present case, there was a discrepancy in the FEIN provided in ETA Form 9089 and in the 2006 tax return; however, the Employer failed to explain the discrepancy.
Accordingly, since the discrepancy in the FEINS was not clarified, the Board affirmed the CO�s denial of certification.
More... (http://www.h1bvisalawyerblog.com/2009/10/balca_upholds_denial_of_labor_29.html)
The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) recently upheld the final determination (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=30320) of a Certifying Officer (CO) denying labor certification (LC) for an alien worker for the position of Electrical Helper.
The employer filed a LC (http://www.mvplawgroup.com/greencards.php?action=laborcert) on behalf of an alien worker and in November of 2007, the CO denied the application because he was unable to verify the Employer as a bona fide business entity. The Employer requested reconsideration by submitting its 2006 Federal Corporate Tax Return, its Business Certificate Registration and two utility bills. The Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) provided on the 2006 Tax Return only matched the first two digits of the FEIN previously provided on Form ETA 9089. Furthermore, the utility bills and the tax return provided a different address from that on the Business Certificate Registration. Thereafter, the CO issued a letter denying reconsideration because the FEIN on the corporate tax return did not match the FEIN on ETA Form 9089. The CO then forwarded the case to BALCA. The Employer filed a letter stating that its company had two addresses, one for its motor shop and the other for its main office, the CO did not file an appellate brief with the Board.
Upon BALCA review, it was determined that the requirement in ETA Form 9089 requiring submission of a FEIN was fully supported by the regulations and by policy of using the FEIN as a means of verifying whether an employer is a bona fide business entity. An employer MUST possess a valid FEIN when applying for labor certification pursuant to PERM (http://www.mvplawgroup.com/greencards.php?action=permprocess) regulation 20 C.F.R. � 656.3. In the present case, there was a discrepancy in the FEIN provided in ETA Form 9089 and in the 2006 tax return; however, the Employer failed to explain the discrepancy.
Accordingly, since the discrepancy in the FEINS was not clarified, the Board affirmed the CO�s denial of certification.
More... (http://www.h1bvisalawyerblog.com/2009/10/balca_upholds_denial_of_labor_29.html)
more...
thescadaman
09-14 07:36 AM
My OPT started on July 12th, 2006 and I did not apply for my H1-B last year because the advanced degree cap quota was reached even before I got my job. Now, my OPT expired on July11th, 2007. My attorney suggested me to use the 60 days grace period to stay in U.S and get my H1-B Visa stamped in Chennai, India (Because, the 60 days grace period will get over by September 11th, 2007 and there is 19 days gap before my H1-B starts). In the H1-B approval notice it is clearly mentioned that I would attend the Chennai consulate for my stamping. The problem is that, I am not able to find available dates in Chennai consulate for H1-B stamping. Can I attend Delhi or Mumbai consulates? Please suggest me a way to come out of this situation.
You will have to fill in Form I-824. The Question 2b - "USCIS to notify a different U.S. Consulate or Port-of-Entry about the approval of an application or petition. Please notify the U.S. Consulate or Port-of-Entry at:", you will select Delhi or Mumbai consulate here. I need to warm you that this is a very slow process and you hardly have any time.
http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-824.pdf
First and foremost, you will have to make sure that you are not overstaying and going beyond your 2 month grace period. Hence make arrangements for international travel and consider this top priority!
Now that I have answered your question. I would like to request you not to open multiple threads asking the same question. Please delete your second thread.
Also, I am hoping that you are aware of this Big Rally event which IV is planning for. Please see if you can contribute towards the Rally in any form.
Note: This is my opinion. Please consult with your Attorney and take any decision.
You will have to fill in Form I-824. The Question 2b - "USCIS to notify a different U.S. Consulate or Port-of-Entry about the approval of an application or petition. Please notify the U.S. Consulate or Port-of-Entry at:", you will select Delhi or Mumbai consulate here. I need to warm you that this is a very slow process and you hardly have any time.
http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-824.pdf
First and foremost, you will have to make sure that you are not overstaying and going beyond your 2 month grace period. Hence make arrangements for international travel and consider this top priority!
Now that I have answered your question. I would like to request you not to open multiple threads asking the same question. Please delete your second thread.
Also, I am hoping that you are aware of this Big Rally event which IV is planning for. Please see if you can contribute towards the Rally in any form.
Note: This is my opinion. Please consult with your Attorney and take any decision.
hair Penelope Cruz – Supporting
days_go_by
01-29 02:07 PM
I was browsing the jobs forum on craigslist and i was shocked to see some user urging people to call Senator Cornyn to not push H1 and Eb visa increases.
Of all places I least expected anti immigrants to be so active on craigslist.
Those who still have doubts about what we are against, let this be an eye opener.
And what are we doing? fighting each other? Wake up
------------------------
http://forums.craigslist.org/?forumID=7
Immediate Calls Needed to Stop H-1B Increase < t_g > 01/29 11:33:27
Immediate Calls Needed to Stop H-1B Increase
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) is leading an end-of-year effort to nearly double the importation of H-1B nonimmigrant foreign workers and to more than double the number of employment-based (EB) permanent residents admitted to the United States each year, among other things. This proposal would:
� Depress wages in high-skill occupations.
� Force more highly-skilled American workers onto the unemployment rolls.
� Further erode America�s middle class.
� Deter American children from pursuing degrees in high-tech fields.
Call the capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 or (877) 762-8762. Tell your Representative and Senators to oppose any H-1B increase. Who represents me?
Of all places I least expected anti immigrants to be so active on craigslist.
Those who still have doubts about what we are against, let this be an eye opener.
And what are we doing? fighting each other? Wake up
------------------------
http://forums.craigslist.org/?forumID=7
Immediate Calls Needed to Stop H-1B Increase < t_g > 01/29 11:33:27
Immediate Calls Needed to Stop H-1B Increase
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) is leading an end-of-year effort to nearly double the importation of H-1B nonimmigrant foreign workers and to more than double the number of employment-based (EB) permanent residents admitted to the United States each year, among other things. This proposal would:
� Depress wages in high-skill occupations.
� Force more highly-skilled American workers onto the unemployment rolls.
� Further erode America�s middle class.
� Deter American children from pursuing degrees in high-tech fields.
Call the capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 or (877) 762-8762. Tell your Representative and Senators to oppose any H-1B increase. Who represents me?
more...
gcdreamer05
02-17 09:49 AM
How did you come to a conclusion there is a huge rejection rate in chennai ?
hot Actress Penelope Cruz greets
Blog Feeds
06-09 02:10 PM
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0ThjYyDkeaq6NuoQ7f-9EAd0mk1YiZRTKE_gCDQJhdNf4ykmnOMU81pgfB55OBydVLfZHaNvnrKc21ZeN9CanjW8mqrThbVWzw9fCTSv94q_FYE_rv-KLDGU3_LLudoaN5Ye6wyKfcPR7/s200/Stethoscope.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0ThjYyDkeaq6NuoQ7f-9EAd0mk1YiZRTKE_gCDQJhdNf4ykmnOMU81pgfB55OBydVLfZHaNvnrKc21ZeN9CanjW8mqrThbVWzw9fCTSv94q_FYE_rv-KLDGU3_LLudoaN5Ye6wyKfcPR7/s1600-h/Stethoscope.jpg)
The US Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) has issued new guidance (http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/health_care_occupations_20may09.pdf)on the standards for adjudicating H-1B petitions filed on behalf of beneficiaries seeking employment in a health-care specialty occupation.
The memo suggests that adjudicators should first consult the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics� Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) to determine whether the position qualifies as a H-1B "specialty occupation" as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act.
The memo addresses licensing requirements for health-care workers in detail, and the effect of having a license - or not having a license - on approval of a case. If the foreign national has the required license, the adjudicator should not "look beyond the license." If the foreign national has a restricted license (e.g., license approved except for mandatory supervised practice), and the petition is otherwise approvable, an adjudicator should approve the petition for one year, or the duration of the restricted license, whichever is longer.
If the employee does not have the license because s/he needs certain immigration documents before getting a license, CIS can approved the petition for one year. The memo says that "The approval of any such H-1B petition shall not constitute approval by USCIS for the alien beneficiary to engage in any activity requiring possession of such State or local license. It is merely a means to facilitate the state or local licensing authority�s issuance of such a license to the alien, provided all other requirements are satisfied." Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/adrianclarkmbbs/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/adrianclarkmbbs/) http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-4875672805913302124?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/05/new-guidance-issued-on-h-1bs-for.html)
The US Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) has issued new guidance (http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/health_care_occupations_20may09.pdf)on the standards for adjudicating H-1B petitions filed on behalf of beneficiaries seeking employment in a health-care specialty occupation.
The memo suggests that adjudicators should first consult the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics� Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) to determine whether the position qualifies as a H-1B "specialty occupation" as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act.
The memo addresses licensing requirements for health-care workers in detail, and the effect of having a license - or not having a license - on approval of a case. If the foreign national has the required license, the adjudicator should not "look beyond the license." If the foreign national has a restricted license (e.g., license approved except for mandatory supervised practice), and the petition is otherwise approvable, an adjudicator should approve the petition for one year, or the duration of the restricted license, whichever is longer.
If the employee does not have the license because s/he needs certain immigration documents before getting a license, CIS can approved the petition for one year. The memo says that "The approval of any such H-1B petition shall not constitute approval by USCIS for the alien beneficiary to engage in any activity requiring possession of such State or local license. It is merely a means to facilitate the state or local licensing authority�s issuance of such a license to the alien, provided all other requirements are satisfied." Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/adrianclarkmbbs/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/adrianclarkmbbs/) http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-4875672805913302124?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/05/new-guidance-issued-on-h-1bs-for.html)
more...
house Penelope Cruz 2010 Oscars.
andyny73
12-09 10:31 AM
Thank you for your reply.
Andrea
Andrea
tattoo Penelope Cruz at the Oscars
logiclife
02-19 11:08 AM
There is a whole thread dedicated to priority date transfers after approved 140. I would suggest you read the whole thread as its very very informative.
There are many things that have to be considered before quitting and joining a new employer if you expect to port your PD from existing case to a new case of Greencard.
See this: http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=912
Closing this thread coz its redundant and the older thread offers more information and experiences.
There are many things that have to be considered before quitting and joining a new employer if you expect to port your PD from existing case to a new case of Greencard.
See this: http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=912
Closing this thread coz its redundant and the older thread offers more information and experiences.
more...
pictures Penelope Cruz Elegant High
wandmaker
10-01 12:18 PM
I'm currently working for Company A on H1B Visa. My GC is sponsored through Company B as a future employee. I never worked for Company B which has sponsored for my GC. I have applied for I485 and I140 has been approved for more than 6 months.
Company A is going through lay offs and wont be able to apply for my GC. My 6 yr limit on H1B from Company A will expire next year.
Can i apply for H1B extension through Company A based on my I-140 from Company B.
Yes, it is legal, allowed, and possible
no. Comp A cannot apply for H1 extension as the PERM labor is not held by them. What you can do is get an EAD and continue to work for Company A, but then Company A will have to take over the process using AC21
Incorrect
Company A is going through lay offs and wont be able to apply for my GC. My 6 yr limit on H1B from Company A will expire next year.
Can i apply for H1B extension through Company A based on my I-140 from Company B.
Yes, it is legal, allowed, and possible
no. Comp A cannot apply for H1 extension as the PERM labor is not held by them. What you can do is get an EAD and continue to work for Company A, but then Company A will have to take over the process using AC21
Incorrect
dresses Actress Penelope Cruz
thakurrajiv
11-03 02:24 PM
Dont you need the FP notice to even enter that building, the guard or the cop standing will not even let you in, if you dont have the FP call for notice.
I never heard of walk-ins :)
gcdreamer is right, you need FP notice. But if your question is if you miss your appointment date and then whether you can walk in another day, then answer is yes. I went to FP 2 weeks ago. A lady next to me, had FP notice dated 3 weeks earlier.The office let her get FP done.I personally did not do this.
I never heard of walk-ins :)
gcdreamer is right, you need FP notice. But if your question is if you miss your appointment date and then whether you can walk in another day, then answer is yes. I went to FP 2 weeks ago. A lady next to me, had FP notice dated 3 weeks earlier.The office let her get FP done.I personally did not do this.
more...
makeup Oscars!
waitingforead
09-03 07:51 PM
Well, my forms were returned to my attorney because of some filing issue. So instead of my EAD as I was expecting I have to refile. Of course I now have a job offer that I would like to take.
My husband (who is a US citizen) is in school and will be depending on my salary. I dont know if that counts as a big financial loss.
Where can I go to find this out. I think my attorney i doing a less than great job in giving me the proper options to choose from.
Any help would be appreciated.
My husband (who is a US citizen) is in school and will be depending on my salary. I dont know if that counts as a big financial loss.
Where can I go to find this out. I think my attorney i doing a less than great job in giving me the proper options to choose from.
Any help would be appreciated.
girlfriend Oscar winners Penelope Cruz
gcformeornot
07-25 03:16 PM
This additional poll needs to have an option for "Just you" - someone needs to take my additional 1.5 GC applications!
how to modify poll to add option.
how to modify poll to add option.
hairstyles penelope cruz Oscars 2009
edaltsis
08-19 01:44 PM
Have to live at the mercy. My last 2 EAD renewals were very quick, I got them both in 10-15days after I applied.
nirmal301
03-26 11:03 PM
Hi,
Only pay for your H1 if you know employer or any of your friend has done H1 process from that employer and application was success.
You will find many scams to take H1 fees and never return your money back.
But try to find employer who is ready to file your case and in return can ask for some deposit money for security purpose and same will be return to you once you start working for him.
Whether to pay or not ?
It always depends upon individual..If you think $1500 - $2000 is not big amount for H1 then yes.. pay for it if you don't have any other option.
I did the same thing.. I search for employer who can file my case but was not succeed in that so finally paid H1 fees $2000 :( ...But I guess it will be worth it.
Regards,
Nirms
Only pay for your H1 if you know employer or any of your friend has done H1 process from that employer and application was success.
You will find many scams to take H1 fees and never return your money back.
But try to find employer who is ready to file your case and in return can ask for some deposit money for security purpose and same will be return to you once you start working for him.
Whether to pay or not ?
It always depends upon individual..If you think $1500 - $2000 is not big amount for H1 then yes.. pay for it if you don't have any other option.
I did the same thing.. I search for employer who can file my case but was not succeed in that so finally paid H1 fees $2000 :( ...But I guess it will be worth it.
Regards,
Nirms
manbeing
12-27 04:35 PM
Hi sbmallik ,
Thanks for your reply. what's the continuous employment criteria? Is the reason my attorney enter '5/17' instead of '5/15'?
I have a letter from HR and saying the last day at my previous company was '5/15'. very boring!!!!
I will fell more comfortable if the experience letter mentions the last day as 5/17/2009. Otherwise I will simply mention it as April 2009. This way the continuous employment criteria will be met.
Thanks for your reply. what's the continuous employment criteria? Is the reason my attorney enter '5/17' instead of '5/15'?
I have a letter from HR and saying the last day at my previous company was '5/15'. very boring!!!!
I will fell more comfortable if the experience letter mentions the last day as 5/17/2009. Otherwise I will simply mention it as April 2009. This way the continuous employment criteria will be met.
No comments:
Post a Comment