GlobeTrotter100
10-11 10:59 AM
thanks, gc chahiye!
wallpaper pictures Her dark brown hair
GCBy3000
07-27 10:50 AM
People who are in US just for conversion rate can now think of this move. I USD = 39.4 INR, 1 Canadian $ = 37.xx. Not a big difference.
illusions
03-17 03:14 PM
Does anybody know how one can (if at all possible) to switch from EB3 to EB2 ? what is the criteria ? Has anybody done it ?
Any light on this subject will help
Any light on this subject will help
2011 Her smooth dark brown hair was
GC_SUCK
08-07 04:35 PM
On there are ppl who filed 485 (RD) in 2007 and got approved. I have no idea how they got approved.
more...
perm2gc
09-07 05:00 PM
I meant before I am out of status.
Also, if there are no paystubs for that period, are there any implications in regards to GC processing or any other way ?
Thanks a bunch.
OzIn Some Cases USCIS may ask paystubs before approving the H1(So be careful with company A..you need them until you get the approval notice). In case of GC, couple of months will not effect the process.
Also, if there are no paystubs for that period, are there any implications in regards to GC processing or any other way ?
Thanks a bunch.
OzIn Some Cases USCIS may ask paystubs before approving the H1(So be careful with company A..you need them until you get the approval notice). In case of GC, couple of months will not effect the process.
geestring
10-31 05:54 PM
3dsmax cost money. try gmax. its made by same company but its free.
and these programs are way more complicated
and these programs are way more complicated
more...
ChainReaction
08-08 11:53 AM
Hi ,
Finally after a long wait i heard some good news from my lawyer that my labor from PBEC has been approved.
I have few questions in regards to my H1-B visa extension . The labor that got approved was from my previous company PD March2003 and i also have labor pending for my current company PD Feb2005.
I wanted to apply for three yrs extension on my H1B I will be completing my 5th yr in Feb 15th 2007 and would like to know if i can get 3yr extension after premium processing i-140 bec based on some of the post on IV i came to this conclusion that one has to be in/past their 6th yr term on H1b according to AC21?
Secondly, i would like to know if i can use copy of approved i-140 from my previous company and get 3yrs H1b extension.
Finally after a long wait i heard some good news from my lawyer that my labor from PBEC has been approved.
I have few questions in regards to my H1-B visa extension . The labor that got approved was from my previous company PD March2003 and i also have labor pending for my current company PD Feb2005.
I wanted to apply for three yrs extension on my H1B I will be completing my 5th yr in Feb 15th 2007 and would like to know if i can get 3yr extension after premium processing i-140 bec based on some of the post on IV i came to this conclusion that one has to be in/past their 6th yr term on H1b according to AC21?
Secondly, i would like to know if i can use copy of approved i-140 from my previous company and get 3yrs H1b extension.
2010 medium length dark brown
gc2
10-04 10:58 AM
hi, i recently filed 485,EAD,AP for my wife and the attorney asked for check of $1010/- that includes unlimited EAD renewals.
Is this really possible ? Please advise.
Is this really possible ? Please advise.
more...
ha002
06-14 07:45 PM
Hello
My wife is on F1 Visa and working on OPT(Optional Practical Training), now that the PD are all current., i will be applying for I-485 in july,
1) can i include her even thought she is on OPT, will that effect our I-485 approval as she is a non-immigrant status
2) should be convert back to H4
3) how easy is it to get appoitments in India now for Visa stamping
Please advice
My wife is on F1 Visa and working on OPT(Optional Practical Training), now that the PD are all current., i will be applying for I-485 in july,
1) can i include her even thought she is on OPT, will that effect our I-485 approval as she is a non-immigrant status
2) should be convert back to H4
3) how easy is it to get appoitments in India now for Visa stamping
Please advice
hair Curly Hair Medium Length
mhkumar
03-24 06:02 PM
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/03/24/goodbye-chang-so-long-singh/
more...
wandmaker
11-30 10:04 AM
aries: when there is no front-log, it is usually two weeks to reach the employer... add your employer or attorney shipping... email delays.
hot Hairstyle: Medium Length
zxcvb
07-23 09:17 PM
If they reject the application if a signature or something is missing. Can we refile again? Or do we wait for PD to become current again.
more...
house Medium Length Brown Hair.
noida123
07-29 07:33 PM
Sona 75, Sent u a PM
tattoo medium length brown hair
laborpains
10-15 12:47 PM
imh1b, lmao you just made my day.!
Good question.
I am busy in meetings today and this weekend. But I will have some time on Monday. Please remind me on Monday to ask him your question. Thank you. :D
Good question.
I am busy in meetings today and this weekend. But I will have some time on Monday. Please remind me on Monday to ask him your question. Thank you. :D
more...
pictures With her dark brown hair and
like_watching_paint_dry
03-11 10:36 PM
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4438.html
Run-out? Or LBW?
Run-out? Or LBW?
dresses 2011 Brown hair. Long
Blog Feeds
09-18 10:20 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
There has been a lot of talk recently about what might be included in an immigration reform bill. Will there be a legalization/amnesty/forgiveness of "lawbreakers" rule? Will there be an expansion of employment based and family based immigrant visa numbers to solve the economically devastating backlogs we currently deal with? Will there be a mandatory E-Verify component? Will there be an interior enforcement focus? Will there be even more fences?
The topic that seems to be lost in all this speculation is something I consider to be the overriding component of reform--the Key to holding a reform package together. I am speaking, of course, of Due Process Restoration. Anyone who deals with immigrants for any length of time is intimately familiar with the disaster that is our immigration enforcement system. It is not just that previous administrations have done a horrific job at the enforcement that should have been taking place, but rather, the missing component to that enforcement. When is the last time an ICE officer worried about Due Process considerations? What is really destroying immigrant families--how about 212(a)(9)(B) and (C)? What about the concept of "civil" detention in real jails with real criminals for non-criminal immigrants? What about the detention of Asylum Seekers? What about the ludicrous requirements of REAL ID for asylum seekers?
These are all only a few of the regular violations of concepts most American hold sacred. When you tell the 'average' American about the system immigrants actually have to deal with, most are appropriately appalled. It is to those Americans that we must speak. I believe that if Senator Schumer has the courage to include Due Process Restoration in his "Comprehensive" immigration reform bill, it will be tragically necessary for us to defend these Due Process provisions of the reform package.
Take a look at this video, and sign up to support including Due Process Restoration in a comprehensive immigration reform bill.
Restore Fairness: bring back due process to the immigration system (http://vimeo.com/6200660) from Breakthrough (http://vimeo.com/letsbreakthrough) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7017328086435157158?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/due-process-restoration-now.html)
There has been a lot of talk recently about what might be included in an immigration reform bill. Will there be a legalization/amnesty/forgiveness of "lawbreakers" rule? Will there be an expansion of employment based and family based immigrant visa numbers to solve the economically devastating backlogs we currently deal with? Will there be a mandatory E-Verify component? Will there be an interior enforcement focus? Will there be even more fences?
The topic that seems to be lost in all this speculation is something I consider to be the overriding component of reform--the Key to holding a reform package together. I am speaking, of course, of Due Process Restoration. Anyone who deals with immigrants for any length of time is intimately familiar with the disaster that is our immigration enforcement system. It is not just that previous administrations have done a horrific job at the enforcement that should have been taking place, but rather, the missing component to that enforcement. When is the last time an ICE officer worried about Due Process considerations? What is really destroying immigrant families--how about 212(a)(9)(B) and (C)? What about the concept of "civil" detention in real jails with real criminals for non-criminal immigrants? What about the detention of Asylum Seekers? What about the ludicrous requirements of REAL ID for asylum seekers?
These are all only a few of the regular violations of concepts most American hold sacred. When you tell the 'average' American about the system immigrants actually have to deal with, most are appropriately appalled. It is to those Americans that we must speak. I believe that if Senator Schumer has the courage to include Due Process Restoration in his "Comprehensive" immigration reform bill, it will be tragically necessary for us to defend these Due Process provisions of the reform package.
Take a look at this video, and sign up to support including Due Process Restoration in a comprehensive immigration reform bill.
Restore Fairness: bring back due process to the immigration system (http://vimeo.com/6200660) from Breakthrough (http://vimeo.com/letsbreakthrough) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7017328086435157158?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/due-process-restoration-now.html)
more...
makeup girl with dark brown wavy hair medium, straight, thick, caucasian,
Blog Feeds
07-16 04:50 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
There are only 65,000 visas given for regular H-1Bs and 20,000 for holders of US Master's Degree. As of July 09, only 24,800 regular petitions were filed and 10,600 US Master's petition were filed. The reason for this slow filing is two fold.
Heading into a deeper recession, the economy is definitely a factor. Unlike what most people think, Companies would rather hire US workers, and not pay the $2320/- filing fees plus attorney's fees.
However there are some professions which have a shortage in the US. That is true of computer professionals. But the computer professional market has been bruised by a poorly conceived and legally impermissible memo that CIS promulgated on January 08, 2010. The CIS is their infinite wisdom deemed that professionals need to be "controlled" directly by the petitioning company.
The IT business typically have contracts that go through tiers--- from the petitioning company to the end user. The CIS thinks that this creates "job shop" a four letter word to them.
The Jan 08 memo is startling in how unconstitutional it is---- how it totally disregards the rule of law. The class action lawsuit against it will hopefully see the end of the memo. Meanwhile software companies are outsourcing their business elsewhere.
However if there is a contract using an intermediary, control can be shown if another employee of the same H-1B employer works for the end user and actually supervises the H-1B beneficiary.
For instance if Company A, the H-1B employer has a contract with Company F and Company F has a contract with the end user, Company Bigshot. If Company A has employee X who works for Big Shot too, who supervises employee Y, who is the beneficiary, then control can be established under the January 08 memo. Of course all companies have to provide a ton of document to prove the case.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-5047952532017099820?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/how-to-how-to-show-control-under-jan-08.html)
There are only 65,000 visas given for regular H-1Bs and 20,000 for holders of US Master's Degree. As of July 09, only 24,800 regular petitions were filed and 10,600 US Master's petition were filed. The reason for this slow filing is two fold.
Heading into a deeper recession, the economy is definitely a factor. Unlike what most people think, Companies would rather hire US workers, and not pay the $2320/- filing fees plus attorney's fees.
However there are some professions which have a shortage in the US. That is true of computer professionals. But the computer professional market has been bruised by a poorly conceived and legally impermissible memo that CIS promulgated on January 08, 2010. The CIS is their infinite wisdom deemed that professionals need to be "controlled" directly by the petitioning company.
The IT business typically have contracts that go through tiers--- from the petitioning company to the end user. The CIS thinks that this creates "job shop" a four letter word to them.
The Jan 08 memo is startling in how unconstitutional it is---- how it totally disregards the rule of law. The class action lawsuit against it will hopefully see the end of the memo. Meanwhile software companies are outsourcing their business elsewhere.
However if there is a contract using an intermediary, control can be shown if another employee of the same H-1B employer works for the end user and actually supervises the H-1B beneficiary.
For instance if Company A, the H-1B employer has a contract with Company F and Company F has a contract with the end user, Company Bigshot. If Company A has employee X who works for Big Shot too, who supervises employee Y, who is the beneficiary, then control can be established under the January 08 memo. Of course all companies have to provide a ton of document to prove the case.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-5047952532017099820?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/how-to-how-to-show-control-under-jan-08.html)
girlfriend Medium length layered hair,
mihird
05-22 07:43 PM
What happens if I am in the 6th year of my H1, have the LC and I140, both approved from my current employer, and file for H1 extension while waiting on the retrogression...By all means, I will get the 3 year extension...
But, here's what is interesting I also have a concurrent H1 with another employer since the 5th year of my 6 year stay from the day I first entered on a H1. Assuming I have the LC and I140 approved on my 1st H1 and get the 3 year extension past the 6 years, can I get a similar 3 year extension on the concurrent H1?
Can anyone shed some light on it?
But, here's what is interesting I also have a concurrent H1 with another employer since the 5th year of my 6 year stay from the day I first entered on a H1. Assuming I have the LC and I140 approved on my 1st H1 and get the 3 year extension past the 6 years, can I get a similar 3 year extension on the concurrent H1?
Can anyone shed some light on it?
hairstyles Guys with medium length scene
jkamdar
04-17 01:02 AM
I have received the following 485 Rfe for my spouse and myself, I am posting the whole
text from RFE letter. Also USCIS has sent me a copy of the current I-693 Form which
was sent with our application as a sealed copy.
The reason I think for the RFE is because the civil surgeon I had used was in the list
of USCIS civil surgeons in 2007 but now he is no more in the list, hence as they touched my application now, the form need to be signed by a designed civil surgeon on the current uscis list. Has any one received an rfe like or similar to this.
Please suggest the best possible to resolve this one.
Request For Evidence
This office is unable to complete the processing of your application without further information. Please read and comply with the request below, then submit the evidence to the above address. Include a copy of this letter and place the attached gold sheet on top of your documents.
A review of your file indicates that the medical examination(Form I-693) you submitted was not completed by a designated civil surgeon, and therefore this Service cannot accept it.
Please take the enclosed copy of Form(I-693) with this notice to the same clinic so that
the designated civil surgeon can review and sign the medical examination. A list of designated civil surgeons can be obtained by calling the USCIS National Customer Service Centre at 1-800-375-8253, or via the USCIS website at www.uscis.gov. You do not need to undergo the entire medical examination.Once this is complete, please return the amendend Form I-693 in an envelope sealed by the designated civil surgeon.
You must submit the requested information within thirty(30) days from the date of this letter(33 days if this notice received by mail). Failure to do so may result in the denial of your application.
text from RFE letter. Also USCIS has sent me a copy of the current I-693 Form which
was sent with our application as a sealed copy.
The reason I think for the RFE is because the civil surgeon I had used was in the list
of USCIS civil surgeons in 2007 but now he is no more in the list, hence as they touched my application now, the form need to be signed by a designed civil surgeon on the current uscis list. Has any one received an rfe like or similar to this.
Please suggest the best possible to resolve this one.
Request For Evidence
This office is unable to complete the processing of your application without further information. Please read and comply with the request below, then submit the evidence to the above address. Include a copy of this letter and place the attached gold sheet on top of your documents.
A review of your file indicates that the medical examination(Form I-693) you submitted was not completed by a designated civil surgeon, and therefore this Service cannot accept it.
Please take the enclosed copy of Form(I-693) with this notice to the same clinic so that
the designated civil surgeon can review and sign the medical examination. A list of designated civil surgeons can be obtained by calling the USCIS National Customer Service Centre at 1-800-375-8253, or via the USCIS website at www.uscis.gov. You do not need to undergo the entire medical examination.Once this is complete, please return the amendend Form I-693 in an envelope sealed by the designated civil surgeon.
You must submit the requested information within thirty(30) days from the date of this letter(33 days if this notice received by mail). Failure to do so may result in the denial of your application.
purgan
04-27 08:22 AM
i don't think disability is a bar especially if you're an employee and contributing since 98. Of course, there are some health related bars, but many of those relate to communicable dieases etc. The USCIS has publications on the medically-related bars, you should check on the USCIS website for more information (search for a form I-693)
guchi472000
11-22 02:35 PM
Thank you very much for your response.
No comments:
Post a Comment