fatboysam
02-12 08:33 PM
Thanks for replying, i have some more questions related to this
Lets say my current employer is A and next employer is B
1. Do employers normally revoke I140 when employee leaves ?
2. If my first PERM and I140 was under EB3 category, then can i switch to EB2 category with the next company ?
3. Suppose i leave A and Join B, and after 2-3 months i join another company C, in this case will C be able to port my I140 from A ?
Lets say my current employer is A and next employer is B
1. Do employers normally revoke I140 when employee leaves ?
2. If my first PERM and I140 was under EB3 category, then can i switch to EB2 category with the next company ?
3. Suppose i leave A and Join B, and after 2-3 months i join another company C, in this case will C be able to port my I140 from A ?
wallpaper Raven Symone
GC4US
10-22 11:19 PM
Could somebody tell me, please, if Uscis is sending 2 notices for finger printing? I mean one notice with one date and another notice with another date?Or is sending only 1 appointment.
I don't know where I read that you have to go for the finger printing 2 times.
Is this true?
Thanks in advance!
I don't know where I read that you have to go for the finger printing 2 times.
Is this true?
Thanks in advance!
bhatt
05-21 11:31 AM
Hello,
Here's my situation:
H1b: 7th Year (valid through Nov 2009)
Labor: Approved
140: Approved
Category: EB2
Priority Date: Aug 2007
485/EAD: cannot file due to retrogression
I have a permanent employment offer from the employer where I am contracting, right now for the same job. Following are the questions I have:
1. Can I change my employer?
2. Can I retain my Priority date?
3. If the new employer files for transfer of H1, what does it mean to my extension beyond 7th year?
Please help.
Thank you.
U need to start the GC process all over again, unless ur current employer is willing to support you in filing the I-485 without revoking the I-140
Here's my situation:
H1b: 7th Year (valid through Nov 2009)
Labor: Approved
140: Approved
Category: EB2
Priority Date: Aug 2007
485/EAD: cannot file due to retrogression
I have a permanent employment offer from the employer where I am contracting, right now for the same job. Following are the questions I have:
1. Can I change my employer?
2. Can I retain my Priority date?
3. If the new employer files for transfer of H1, what does it mean to my extension beyond 7th year?
Please help.
Thank you.
U need to start the GC process all over again, unless ur current employer is willing to support you in filing the I-485 without revoking the I-140
2011 as: Concerts,Raven Symone
fatboysam
02-12 08:33 PM
Thanks for replying, i have some more questions related to this
Lets say my current employer is A and next employer is B
1. Do employers normally revoke I140 when employee leaves ?
2. If my first PERM and I140 was under EB3 category, then can i switch to EB2 category with the next company ?
3. Suppose i leave A and Join B, and after 2-3 months i join another company C, in this case will C be able to port my I140 from A ?
Lets say my current employer is A and next employer is B
1. Do employers normally revoke I140 when employee leaves ?
2. If my first PERM and I140 was under EB3 category, then can i switch to EB2 category with the next company ?
3. Suppose i leave A and Join B, and after 2-3 months i join another company C, in this case will C be able to port my I140 from A ?
more...
chintu25
08-16 02:36 PM
hI wALKING dUDE tHANKS FOR jOINING IN .....yOU CAN HELP BY POSTING BANNERS AND POSTERS IN groceries and temples and other places such as gyms etc to propagate our cause . You can find the slogan/banners in thread posted on mainpage or i can email u some all the best
fasterthanlight�
05-19 05:49 PM
Agreed.
more...
viveksri
06-19 11:59 AM
Finally USCIS has corrected the processing date typo. The dates are not back to original track.
I guess its good news from the EAD point of view.
VS
I guess its good news from the EAD point of view.
VS
2010 raven symon 1
looneytunezez
06-05 07:02 PM
Overtime is paid only if you are a non-exempt employee - usually means you get paid hourly. If you are an exempt employee, then you are not eligible for overtime. Not sure if this is different in different states, but that is how it works in Ohio.
Same is true here in CA (Only non-exempt employees get overtime).
Again, check with your state agency regards to overtime pay..... or consult a employment attorney...
Same is true here in CA (Only non-exempt employees get overtime).
Again, check with your state agency regards to overtime pay..... or consult a employment attorney...
more...
Blog Feeds
09-08 09:50 AM
San Diego Immigration lawyer informed that the Department of Homeland Security, USCIS has submitted the information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on June 9, 2009, at 74 FR 27339, allowing for a 60-day public comment period. USCIS did not receive any comments for this information collection. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comments. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until October 2, 2009. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and suggestions especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) USCIS Desk Officer. Comments may be submitted to: USCIS, Chief, Regulatory Products Division, Clearance Office, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, DC 20529-2210. Comments may also be submitted to DHS via facsimile to 202-272-8352 or via e-mail at rfs.regs@dhs.gov, and OMB USCIS Desk Officer via facsimile at 202-395-5806 or via oira_ submission@omb.eop.gov.
We suggest when submitting comments by e-mail please make sure to add OMB Control Number 1615-0035 in the subject box. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies should address one or more of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/uscis_issues_extension_of_info.html)
Written comments and suggestions especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) USCIS Desk Officer. Comments may be submitted to: USCIS, Chief, Regulatory Products Division, Clearance Office, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, DC 20529-2210. Comments may also be submitted to DHS via facsimile to 202-272-8352 or via e-mail at rfs.regs@dhs.gov, and OMB USCIS Desk Officer via facsimile at 202-395-5806 or via oira_ submission@omb.eop.gov.
We suggest when submitting comments by e-mail please make sure to add OMB Control Number 1615-0035 in the subject box. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies should address one or more of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/uscis_issues_extension_of_info.html)
hair Raven-Symone
gcpool
02-03 11:14 AM
Currently there are a lot of RFE's and renewal denials when they try to renew onsite. So they have been asked to go back to get renewed and once its successful, they come back. They are just being cautious.
more...
FredG
April 8th, 2004, 08:53 AM
good idea!