Monday, June 20, 2011

short hair styles 2011 for men

images New Short Haircuts For Men short hair styles 2011 for men. asian short hair styles 2011
  • asian short hair styles 2011



  • hpandey
    02-12 09:25 AM
    thanks mhtanim....

    It seems that i can file tax using form 4852....but to do if he send legal notice claiming that i have made losses to him worth 25 K....i had good relation with client , gave app notice and also have refe letter from client (received award form client)..........so there shud be no point for liquidation thing and also i have all previous employers emails acepting my receignation and notice period...

    Its just what it is - a notice. Let him take it to the court and prove that you actually caused him a loss of 25K. You also have proof from your side that you gave him ample notice and that he has not paid your last month dues ( which he cannot keep ) and so forth including the stuff that he is not giving your W2 ( which is unlawful ).

    For every reason the law is on your side. You do not have anything to fear.

    And believe me the legal fees for taking this to court will cost him more than the 25K he is claiming and I am sure he will not want to get the DOL to investigate him and his background since it looks like he might have some skeletons in his closet too.





    wallpaper asian short hair styles 2011 short hair styles 2011 for men. hairstyles 2011 men short.
  • hairstyles 2011 men short.



  • nyte_crawler
    09-15 08:23 AM
    What kind of job is that that pays $$$ an hour? LOBBYING ? :)





    short hair styles 2011 for men. hairstyles 2011 men short.
  • hairstyles 2011 men short.



  • aspiration
    06-24 10:21 AM
    Is there any updates on full committee hearing ,which was scheduled for hearing on 23rd June ?





    2011 hairstyles 2011 men short. short hair styles 2011 for men. short hairstyles 2011 for men.
  • short hairstyles 2011 for men.



  • gc_on_demand
    11-10 11:45 AM
    I think I have joined IV in last 3 years or so...
    Donated money once & have called congressmen & senators many times ...

    Could someone please tell me -

    What has been achieved by IV till date? I know we all meet elected reps, officials in washington dc ..... but I am interested in end result like not wasting visa numbers , implementing spillover & along these lines.

    I have asked few friends to join IV but then if they ask me for IV accomplishments - i can't count any....

    (1) Reversal of July 2007 bulletin
    (2) Two year EAD AP
    (3) Currently working on Same similar job ( AC 21).
    (4) Push USCIS and DOS to publish data.



    more...


    short hair styles 2011 for men. short haircuts 2011 men. short
  • short haircuts 2011 men. short



  • arsh007
    11-20 10:30 AM
    I am also waiting for a GC to buy a house ... can't buy on a H1 visa with a project that keeps on getting extended every 3-6 months. You need stability for at least a few years to put in a committment for a mortgage that you are going to pay for 30 years.

    I also work in a IT consulting position but still decided to go ahead and buy a home in St Louis back in September 2007. My 485/EAD/AP was filed in August 2007 and EAD approved a few weeks back. However despite my current situation, I believe buying a home was a wise decision considering the kind of lifestyle and security it provides for you and your family. I know a lot of my friends who decided to take the plunge and bought houses though they were working on H1 and have their GCs pending for a few years.





    short hair styles 2011 for men. short hair styles 2011 men.
  • short hair styles 2011 men.



  • mammoy2k
    06-05 03:43 PM
    You can read it 10 ways, but the CIS has only one interpretation(see bold below).

    An un-adjudicated Form I-140 petition is not made valid merely through the act of filing the petition with USCIS or through the passage of 180 days. Rather, the petition must have been filed on behalf of an alien who was entitled to the employment-based classification at the time that the petition was filed, and therefore must be approved prior to a favorable determination of a �106(c) AC21 portability request.

    I guess it is the same thing as earlier memo. They are saying that merely 180 days have passed since filing does not provide AC21 benefit. To determine AC21 benefit the petiton must be approved. So based on earlier memo, USCIS would see whther petiton can be approved. If yes then they will evaluate AC21. If not, then you got a problem.



    more...


    short hair styles 2011 for men. hot short haircuts 2011 men.
  • hot short haircuts 2011 men.



  • jungalee43
    06-24 07:33 PM
    First of all congratulations on arriving at a mile stone. But obviously it is not end of the journey.
    It is also not a time to say "thanks and good bye" to IV. Consider the fact that IV has done a lot for us, at least by making Congress aware of our plight and giving the anti immigrationist some run for their money and at times making their heartbit to skip. It is a different matter whether we got the law passed to address our problem, we may not have that much power; a simple fact is that we do not have voting power and Indian-American or Chinese-American community is not 100% behind us.
    But in times like this at least members like you should not leave IV. Then those who have made the dates temporarily current to divide us have just achieved their goals. Anti immigrationist and the writers of the senate amnesty for illegal aliens bill would smile after reading your post. In fact you should announce a one time donation to IV to celebrate your milestone and pledge your continuing support to IV.

    Thanks.

    ___________________________
    Donation $500+ and continuing



    Guys Got approved today morning........... Thanks to everyone on this forum for infinite information........... Will be back when ready for the Citizenship application..................:D

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *** DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL ***

    The last processing action taken on your case

    Receipt Number: LIN0XXXXXXXX

    Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS

    Current Status: Notice mailed welcoming the new permanent resident.

    On June 19, 2007, we mailed you a notice that we had registered this customer's new permanent resident status. Please follow any instructions on the notice. Your new permanent resident card should be mailed within 60 days following this registration or after you complete any ADIT processing referred to in the welcome notice, whichever is later. If you move before you get your new card call customer service. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.

    If you have questions or concerns about your application or the case status results listed above, or if you have not received a decision from USCIS within the current processing time listed*, please contact USCIS Customer Service at (800) 375-5283.

    *Current processing times can be found on the USCIS website at www.uscis.gov under Case Status and Processing Dates.
    *** Please do not respond to this e-mail message.

    Sincerely,
    The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PD- Dec 2002, I485-RD- Dec 2003.





    2010 hairstyles 2011 men short. short hair styles 2011 for men. New Short Haircuts For Men
  • New Short Haircuts For Men



  • wc_user
    11-03 05:19 PM
    Having said all this, I think it is safe to stay for a few months and then move on.. Wehave waited for nearly a decade.. what's the problem in staying for 4 months or so.. just take a vacation and go to India.. A month will go while in India, couple of months in planning and another month in recovering from Jet lag.. there you go.. it is 4 months now..



    more...


    short hair styles 2011 for men. asian short hair styles 2011
  • asian short hair styles 2011



  • Asian
    09-15 10:33 AM
    For those who already received GC, it is trivial. For us who have not received it yet, it is a life or death matter. So please don't play with it. I hate to meet the green card holder who brags as if it were nothing.





    hair short hairstyles 2011 for men. short hair styles 2011 for men. short hairstyles for men 2011.
  • short hairstyles for men 2011.



  • GCplease
    05-13 05:03 PM
    Sorry to hear about your case.

    From what I have heard, you can apply for I485 till your case gets adjudicated. Your PD is Dec 2003. It will easily take 2 to 3 years to get approval. In that time, get your divorce papers, get married, bring your new wife in H4 and apply for her 485. I think you'll be good.

    I am not sure what will happen to your ex. You may need to revoke her 485 application. not sure if you can just revoke hers or you need her to sign some application (which she may not be willing to).

    Check with an attorney. They should be able give you the best advice.


    I and my wife applied for I485(EB3) in July 2007. We both have got our EADs, but not used it.

    My H1 is valid till May 2009. I have I140 approved and have got my H1(3 years) till May 2009.

    My wife has her own H1b valid till Dec 2008.

    We are planning to get divorced. i have applied for Divorce in India in this month (may 2008).

    Is there a way I can cancel my 485 application. Because If i get my green card it will be difficult for me to marry girl from India.

    My wife has mentioned that she will be applying for Divorce in USA.

    Can I withdraw my 485 application and just be on H1 and wait for applying later. I do not care about GC.



    more...


    short hair styles 2011 for men. Cool Short Hairstyles 2011
  • Cool Short Hairstyles 2011



  • ArunAntonio
    08-31 08:15 PM
    I am sure you will find more like you .. just look around and try to recruit more people.

    Driving from CT with my wife on Monday evening, stay overnight in NJ and along with a friend to DC on Tuesday morning!:)

    We are a selfmotivated lot with no blinders!:cool:





    hot short haircuts 2011 men. short short hair styles 2011 for men. images short haircuts 2011
  • images short haircuts 2011



  • grupak
    11-19 01:59 PM
    I was also asked to appear for FP in my attorney's location. Instead, I went to the nearest ASC with my spouse whose FP was in the correct location ahead of my date. I successfully got my FP done. There is a thread "FP in wrong city" where other people had similar issues.

    From my experience, talking to lawyer, USCIS doesn't care as long as you get it done before the due date. Try the local ASC... its always the guard in front who may create an issue. Once you are in, fill in some forms, the ASC doesn't care where you were scheduled.

    Imp: Try the local ASC before your scheduled date so that you have time for plan B.



    more...


    house hairstyles 2011 for men short. short hair styles 2011 for men. short hair styles 2011 men.
  • short hair styles 2011 men.



  • longq
    12-20 03:41 PM
    Hello IV and its core members,

    I am one of the members of the forum and suffering due to the severe retrogression of EB visas. I highly appreciate IV�s effort to bring some legislative relief to address the severe backlogs in EB visas. I too participated in all IVs campaign in urging the law makers to bring some relief for this crisis. However, I have some concern here; about the method followed U.S DOS in allocating EB visas particularly in EB2 category for India and China. I am worried whether U.S DOS is violating the INA 202 (a), by suspending AC21 provision that eliminates country quota in EB categories. If they are violating by mistake, it is our responsibility to notify/clarify with them or we need to understand the law clearly. This is very important. Because, even if 110th congress passes SKIL bill, if DOS violates the AC21 law then it will not help applicants from oversubscribed countries (India and China). Here is my analysis based on following facts.

    The cutoff date for EB2 India has moved just 7 days since last 9 months. However EB2 �Row has been current. EB2- ROW has never retrogressed before. EB3 ROW has seen considerable movement in last 9 months.

    There may be four possible separate or combination of following reasons for the freeze of cutoff dates for India in EB2 at Jan 2003.

    1. The backlog elimination effort of DOL pumped massive approved labor certificates from BEC. There may be tons of EB2 applicants from India and China with PD in the year 2001 and 2002 might have applied 485s based on recent approvals from BEC. However I doubt that. Because, in the year 2001, 2002 and 2003, EB3 India and China were �current�. No body cared about filing EB2 labor certification till the later part of 2004. Most lawyers preferred to file EB3 as it was easy, and there were no difference between EB3 and EB2 at that time. First ever indication for EB3 retrogression was issued by DOS only in later part of 2004. I doubt so many people have filed EB2-labor till 2003, keeping in mind that EB3 will retrogress in 2004 or future. Traditionally EB2 has been less demanding compare to EB1 and EB3.

    2. Perhaps, there may be a huge demand by ROW (Due to PERM) to consume all the 86% of visa numbers in EB2 category in every month that prompts DOS to allocate only 7% to India and China. I doubt this too, because India and China itself consume about 60% of EB2 visas.

    3. There may be lot of EB3 Indians and Chinese with PD 2001 and 2002 porting their PD from EB3 to EB2 by filing new LC and EB2-I-140. This may escalate the demand. However, how many will do this? How many employers will to do this �favor� for their employees? A real US employer/big corporations will not do double time work for an employee. Only consulting/staffing companies will do this. I think this may be a small group (or may not be?).

    4. There may be another possible reason. There may be something wrong with U.S.DOS in allocating visa numbers in EB2 category, as per section 202 (a) of current INA. They may be issuing only 2800 (7% of 40,000) visas to India and China in EB2 and redirecting unused EB2 numbers to EB3 category. They may be imposing hard country cap in EB2 (Suspending AC21 law as per their VB Nov 2005). There is a large room for this speculation, due to the pattern of cutoff date movement in EB2 category. This is just a speculation. This argument/speculation is valid if DOS has issued less than 40,000 EB2 visas in FY 2006 as mandated by the law, and issued those numbers (40,000 minus actually issued) to EB3-ROW. In my view, it violates section 203 (b) (2) of the INA. One has to wait till they release statistics for FY 2006, to see how many EB2 visas are issued in that FY.

    Here is some detailed analysis that says why it violates the law.

    Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 203 a and b of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets numbers for each preference categories with in FB and EB.

    Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320. This section also explains how to handle unused numbers with respect to country quota.

    Even before AC21 rule enacted in 2000, there was no �hard� country cap as per INA then. Here is the section of INA before year 2000, describes how to allocate unused visas, if overall/total demand for FB an EB visas are less than supply*.

    INA 202 (a) (3)

    �Exception if additional visas available. - If because of the application of paragraph (2) with respect to one or more foreign states or dependent areas, the total number of visas available under both subsections (a-Family category) and (b-Employment category) of section 203 for a calendar quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who otherwise may be issued such a visa, paragraph (2) shall not apply to visas made available to such states or areas during the remainder of such calendar quarter�.
    Therefore, the 7% country cap had always been �soft� till year 2000.

    After year 2000, AC21 has completely removed country cap in each employment category, if excess visas are available in each preference categories.

    After 2000 (After AC21) the following law was added to INA in the section 202.

    INA 202 (a) (5) (A)
    EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS NOT SUBJECT TO PER COUNTRY LIMITATION IF ADDITIONAL VISAS AVAILABLE- If the total number of visas available under paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) of section 203(b) for a calendar quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who may otherwise be issued such visas, the visas made available under that paragraph shall be issued without regard to the numerical limitation under paragraph (2) of this subsection during the remainder of the calendar quarter.


    As per my simple interpretation of above AC21 rule, DOS should allocate unused visas by ROW �EB2 (ROW- countries other than India and China in EB2 category) for the first two months of any calendar quarter to over-subscribed countries (India & China) at the third month of that calendar quarter. They should not allocate to lower Preference category (EB3), if demand is more in higher preference category (EB2) to consume all the visa numbers in that preference category. They should allocate visas to all the documentarily qualified applicants in that (EB2) preference category, irrespective of country of birth. If they followed this rule/law, there may be a considerable movement in cut-off dates for India and China in Dec 2005, Mar, June and Sep of 2006 in EB2 (last month of each calendar quarter in a fiscal year). We have not witnessed such movement in last 1.5 years. No one knows how DOS is allocating numbers. They may be allocating only 7% visas to India and China in EB2 category very strictly, every month, and allocating unused numbers to EB3 category, by suspending AC21 law as indicated in their Nov 2005 Visa Bulletin. If they do so, it is against the law, at least in my interpretation of AC21 rule that eliminates country quota in EB categories.

    DOS can not interpret above AC21 rule that eliminates per country limit applies �totally� to all EB categories put together, not by individual preference categories. I.e. If they say they will issue more than 2,800 visas to EB2- India per year (more than 7% of 40,000), provided overall demand for EB visas are less than 140,000. If they interpret the law like this, then there is no need for section 202(a) (5) (A) due to AC21 law. The law before AC21 {i.e. section 202 (a) (3)} itself address the elimination of country quota in both FB and EB category*. Then, section 202(a) (5) (A) is a duplicate wording of section 202(a) (3). So, this section of AC21 law becomes a redundant/duplicate law. Then, there is no meaning of employment �preference� category if they interpret �totally or overall worldwide demand�. In other words, a non-Indian/Chinese restaurant cook (EB3) is more preferred than a NIW PhDs (EB2) from India or China. Is it the intend of the congress when enacting AC21 law in removing per country limitation in EB category? Is it the American Competitiveness in 21st century? I highly doubt that.

    Now it is the time to ask US DOS, how they are allocating visa number in EB2 category. If DOS interpreting the law differently, then we need to ask the law makers (Congress) what is their original intension behind the section 202(a)(5)(A) when they drafted the AC21 law in 2000 and how it is differ from 202 (a) (3).

    Perhaps Core IV team can initiate to discuss/consult this issue with an immigration lawyer and place an enquiry with DOS or Law makers, if needed.


    (*Note: DOS do not mix FB and EB categories for visa number allocation/calculation to meet the per country limit. They keep both in separate track to meet separately the 7% limit)





    tattoo short hair styles 2011 men. short hair styles 2011 for men. short hair styles 2011 men.
  • short hair styles 2011 men.



  • rbms
    04-03 09:59 AM
    I think you should send webfax also. 1. It would not hurt. 2. It would show our numbers.
    I didn't webfax but sent my state's US Senators a message through their official portal (I had recieved a response last time I did that). I also followed up with a phone call to their offices.



    more...


    pictures hot short haircuts 2011 men. short hair styles 2011 for men. short haircuts 2011 men. short
  • short haircuts 2011 men. short



  • snathan
    06-16 10:32 PM
    If you hold work visa like H or L you may need to get the re-stamping upon the extension of your expired visa. H1 status and Visa stamping both are different things. H1 approval is the authorization to work in US, and Visa stamped on your passport is authorization to enter into USA.

    Mostly H1 authorizations (form I-797) are issued for 3 years, so the Visa stamped on your passport reflects the date close to this expiry date, unless consulate gives you a Visa for duration less than the Date on your H1 form.

    Once you get your visa extension, it comes with new I-94. But if you need to visit your home country or need to leave the US for any personal/business reason you have to get the stamping in your passport to re-enter the US. Before 911, one can send the passport and relevant documents to the U.S. State Department in Washington D.C. for renewal or re validation of the H1B visa stamp in the passport when the old visa has expired or within sixty (60) days of the H1B visa stamp expiration.

    But in 2004, the re validation division discontinued the domestic visa re-validation. So now all the member who are looking for re-validation must go to home country or Canada/Mexico. But a recent (in 2007) U.S. Department of State (DOS) directive to U.S. consular posts requires consulting an electronic record for visa issuance in non immigrant categories H, L, O, P, and Q.

    The new verification system requires that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) send information on all approved petitions requiring visa issuance to the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC), which is part of the DOS. KCC scans and enters all pertinent information including Form I-129, employer support letter, and beneficiary's identification documents into PIMS. KCC also conducts database checks looking for fraud, violations, or other adverse history and records. A petition must be confirmed in PIMS by the U.S. consular post before issuance of the visa. The USCIS has not been transmitting petitions filed for change of status and extension of status to the KCC. Neither have all new petitions for consular processing been transmitted to KCC, resulting in delayed visa issuance to eligible applicants

    Visa applicants whose information has not been entered into PIMS in a timely manner sometimes have to wait longer than the two days specified for visa issuance. There have been reports from individuals who have had to alter travel plans and arrangements to account for errors and delays in having all of their relevant information entered into PIMS

    There are incidents where people struck up in the foreign country for 45-90 days due to this PIMS delays. So people need to go through lots of hassle including losing the job, could not pay the bills in time, lose your credit history, kids are not able to attend the school�.

    So this campaign is to bring back the re-validation within the US. I am sure there are lots of guys here with H1B and going through this dilemma. So all you people gather here and support this campaign. IV core is ready to support this, if there are enough people are getting affected.

    If you or any of your friends are affected and got struck up in home/foreign country, please share your storey here. We strictly need only the first hand experience.

    Based on the response and support, we can take it forward. We believe this one can be fixed through admin fix. All we need is enough support.

    We need real people and real stories which can be presented to DOS officials and the media. I am sure we can fix this. so please come forward.

    Once we get enough people and stories, we can draft letter along with these stories and send it to relevant authorities. So please spread this to other people.

    Note: If you are not interested in this campaign, please ignore this thread and move on. Please do not post anything irrelevant and do not provoke other members.





    dresses images short haircuts 2011 short hair styles 2011 for men. hot short hairstyles 2011 men.
  • hot short hairstyles 2011 men.



  • gc_check
    06-27 08:17 AM
    I understand that there is lot of fear among applicants that USCIS might retrogress the dates interimly sometime in july due to the expected high volume of applications filing in the begining of july.

    To minimize the chance of USCIS from taking any such steps, shall we all unite and file the applications on a specific date in july probably on 30th of july? This will accomodate all applicants...so that we shall all be winners and use this opportunity to our advantage instead of competing amongst each other...where only a few will be winners and others will be loosers.

    This will also reduce the pressure among applicants , attorneys and doctors.

    Can the AILA cooperate? Will there be unity amongst applicants to make this possible??? any ideas ??

    Dude, From your previous posts looks like you have already filed and got your receipt notice.

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=87755#post87755
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=80880#post80880

    Well, this is not a good idea ... and obviously every one is as anxious as others to get their papers filed on time. This does not make sense at all. I read your posting history and notice your posts with GC approval and also about receipt notice for spouse.

    What is goin on with you ?



    more...


    makeup asian short hair styles 2011 short hair styles 2011 for men. hairstyles 2011 for men short.
  • hairstyles 2011 for men short.



  • satishku_2000
    05-31 01:26 AM
    Please guys, I understand the frustration we're all going through but do not compare it to what happened to the Jews under the Nazis. We are indeed in a bad situation but comparing it to genocide is too much.

    I have seen pictures of the Holocaust and still get nightmares.

    Just keep things in perspective and have faith in God and your destiny.
    Remember, the bill hasn't passed yet. It still has to go through the House of Representatives.

    There is nothing in this world that is as evil as Nazis , People should refrain from using the word at any cost.





    girlfriend short hair styles 2011 men. short hair styles 2011 for men. asian short hair styles 2011
  • asian short hair styles 2011



  • anai
    04-01 03:18 PM
    sent





    hairstyles Cool Short Hairstyles 2011 short hair styles 2011 for men. short hairstyles 2011 men.
  • short hairstyles 2011 men.



  • O'podu
    07-10 10:57 AM
    People who saw the program yesterday... rather than ranting here please go and post a factually correct comment on CNN. If CNN receives the same number of comments as the number of posts on this thread it will be 100 times more effective use of time.

    http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?76

    i have used this link to express my anger and frustration.
    GOD is watching !
    but we cannot just not keep watching.





    nviren
    04-02 04:28 AM
    Done sending both faxes.





    suresh.emails
    08-07 06:04 PM
    Even if I back date my marriage (as advised) , How can I get my future wife to USA?. I cannot get her on depend status as my H1-B (I believe) got canceled on approval of GC.

    Issues I see,

    1. The back date of marriage must match to my stay at India.

    2. I did not visit India in the last one year.

    3. I applied my I-485 in the August 2008 time. So (I must mention my marriage and dependents in the application). Which I did not . So this does not work.

    See the troubles I have now.

    P.S: I did not want to cheat USA Immigration Dept. Not a good practice


    Let me know if there are any guanine ways.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment